32xx movement problem poll and data thread

[77T]

Understand the kidding reference, but in simpler terms, Rolex regulates any movement the same whether 30xx, 31xx, or 32xx.

After all, COSC uses five different positions and METAS uses six - PLUS at least three different temperatures to certify.

So after V&H, we still have 3-4 to go...



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[saxo3]

Yes, PaulG.
I think it's a kind of lost opportunity to check an only 4 months old 32xx caliber, which already loses 4 s/d, with a timegrapher (in 5 positions) to measure if it's only a matter or regulation or if the movement already suffers from the well known too low amplitude effect. We haven't learned anything with the information provided so far.

[belutak]

Originally Posted by saxo3

Yes, PaulG.
I think it's a kind of lost opportunity to check an only 4 months old 32xx caliber, which already loses 4 s/d, with a timegrapher (in 5 positions) to measure if it's only a matter or regulation or if the movement already suffers from the well known too low amplitude effect. We haven't learned anything with the information provided so far.

If the issue was the low amplitude then it still is there - it could not have been fixed by the 5min tuning, I think?

Anyway, I am still away on a trip but when I return to my hometown I will take it to my local RSC again for a proper check because I am also very curious to get to the bottom of the issue (my engineering OCD )


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk