Quote:
Originally Posted by Robtayham
OP, while I hate that you didn’t get the watch you wanted, something about this thread makes me uncomfortable.
So he sold it ‘as is’ and didn’t use knowingly false or misleading language in his ad.
What exactly are you using as justification for a refund? How were you duped?
|
"Duped" implies that the seller did it on purpose; I don't believe he did anything on purpose. I suppose that a guarantee of "100% authenticity" opens up a still different debate, but that is the guarantee that I'd be relying on. I would suppose that technically speaking, one could argue authenticity, but such an argument would seem in bad faith.
You definitely raise a fair point, though, and one I've spent today thinking over. I have no certainty.