|
> Stimp:
Nice one! you should replace the glass, quite scratched... but really a nice piece (now expert should tell what they think, i m a newbie too)
>Orchi:
i know it's a sacrilege but remember i'm a newbie in rolex world:
did great Orchi ever see a 16750 without cyclop?
i mean does anyone try to have the "readibility" of a seadweller with the beauty of the classic GMT?
(please don't burn me down... i am only very curious to see one day this type of customized 16750... thanks for your advice, i know cyclop's lovers will hit the roof but can't see why a 16750 couldn't be without cyclop: you can always replace the cyclop's glass after if you want the original back...or not?)
thanks again for all those precious infos, Orchi ;)
|