[conrail]

Originally Posted by jjkapsberger

It's unfortunate because (apparently) it's erroneous.

In any case, Mulholland's alleged error is irrelevant. The ad didn't represent the dial as original. Originality wasn't a selling point in the context of the ad. OP hasn't shown that any pre-sale correspondence led OP to conclude that the dial is original.

OP had time before his purchase to determine originality. He had five days after the sale to do the same. It's unreasonable for him to claim a refund based on originality a full month after buying the watch. The cancellation terms are clearly stated in the ad. OP cannot impose extra terms simply to make up for his lack of diligence.

OP is still entitled to cancel if he can show that parts are inauthentic. So far he hasn't.