Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum - View Single Post - How comparable is an Omega Seamaster 300m to a Rolex Submariner?

Rashid.bk · 1 January 2014, 04:09 AM

It seems you're leaning towards the Sub. Get that, it will definitely be pleasing.
The Omega Seamaster 300 2220.80 is an amazing and equally classic, beautiful and reliable watch. I am looking for one now and when I find a decent condition one I'm going to snatch it up.
The Sub is one watch the Seamaster is another and I love them both, but if the choice is a pre ceramic Sub, then I'd choose the Omega, either the wave dial or the newer ceramic. If it's an LV or a ceramic Submariner then I'd choose the Subs.
Good luck.

1 January 2014, 04:09 AM	#8
Rashid.bk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Dallas Watch: 12800ft = 3900m Posts: 11,172	It seems you're leaning towards the Sub. Get that, it will definitely be pleasing. The Omega Seamaster 300 2220.80 is an amazing and equally classic, beautiful and reliable watch. I am looking for one now and when I find a decent condition one I'm going to snatch it up. The Sub is one watch the Seamaster is another and I love them both, but if the choice is a pre ceramic Sub, then I'd choose the Omega, either the wave dial or the newer ceramic. If it's an LV or a ceramic Submariner then I'd choose the Subs. Good luck.