The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 29 April 2024, 07:52 AM   #1
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
A 214270 Rolex Story

I have been a fairly regular collector and flipper of mostly Rolex and Omega watches for the last 25 years, every now and then delving into odd brands. I have owned, at one point or another, just about every Rolex model except the GMT Master II, President and Daytona.

My current lineup which has remained fairly stable in recent years are listed in my signature. My favorite if pressed is my 14060 that belonged to my Dad and that I gifted home for his 60th birthday.

I recently pivoted jobs and hadn't been doing any watch collecting of any variety, and recently rekindled my desire to look and see what Rolex had to offer. I was unaware that Rolex offered a 39 mm Explorer since 2010 which indicates how far out of the loop I've been lately.

After doing more research, it was very clear to me that the lower priced model 214270, with Mark 1 dial with white gold applied numerals and T-Rex hands, was the lesser of the two IMHO. Not wanting to make a mistake, I opted to purchase a Mark 2 dial example in mint condition, a 2016 with box and papers. This watch is absolutely beautiful, and it is now my all-time favorite; I can see this being a daily wear for life.

I keep my Dad's Submariner in the safe for special occasions, but this Explorer has no sentimental value to me at this point, and therefore, I feel no hesitation in making it a daily wearer.

The 39mm size just fits perfectly on my wrist, which is fairly average. I had tried on a 36 mm 14270 as well as a 114270 some years ago and felt they were too small for my wrist. I thought at the time "what a shame" and "if only they made a larger model Explorer."

In a way, I'm glad I was out of the loop for sometime because this exact watch was selling for upwards of $11,000 just 2-3 years ago once it was discontinued, and I managed to score this minty example for under $7000 using an eBay promotion which was enough to cover sales tax and a little more. I will never lose money on this watch, and I prefer its 20mm lug spacing to the 21mm oddball size on the new 40mm. I also prefer the matte dial and "Explorer" text on the bottom of the dial on the 214270.

I'm happy to be back collecting again, but I'm not sure where to go from here, or if I even need or want to go anywhere. The Explorer 39 suits me perfectly and I'm just happy to have my potential forever watch!
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.