For $35,000 would you rather have...

[Nico81]

Originally Posted by jgottsman11

I agree. I'm trying to talk some sense into myself for thinking about paying $50,000 for a steel aquanaut when there are amazing pieces out there like the 126655 Rolex or Annual Calendar pateks

Please dont pay $50k for 5167a
You will be very disappointed
(Its a solid watch, but its a time only watch with average finishing on rubber strap)

You’re welcome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[johnsonsxusfrt]

Originally Posted by Nico81

Please dont pay $50k for 5167a
You will be very disappointed
(Its a solid watch, but its a time only watch with average finishing on rubber strap)

You’re welcome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

best post on this thread ;)

[bp1000]

Amazed yet not surprised at this result.

More people would choose a very basic watch in steel and rubber over a classic elegant watch in precious metal with a fantastic complication.

5146 if you hold it is truly beautiful.

[RKunz]

The Aquanaut was initially an entree level watch for millennials. Steel case on rubber strap. The 5146 Annual Cal was the entrance to complications. Definitely Patek DNA but people went sport watch crazy.