ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 April 2024, 07:58 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Gregory LAUSCH
Location: Miami
Watch: FP Journe
Posts: 110
|
New Camera Shopping for Watch photography & Videography
Amongst watch collecting, I also love photography and videography.
I am now on the market to seriously upgrade my game and as of now, the serious contender under my radar is the Nikon Z9. I intend to use the camera mainly to shoot and film watches, hence I’d like to gather some of the experts or passionate folks in this field as to what you’d recommend and why and if the Nikon Z9 would be a great camera for that purpose. Would also be open to some recommendations on what lenses are best from macro to regular photo/video. Thanks
__________________
Curator of Exceptional contemporary & Vintage watches IG: @thesecondhandclub.official |
17 April 2024, 08:19 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,232
|
Not an expert, but have a passion for photography.
I upgraded to full frame this year. I shot a D500 for years and went mirrorless with the Z8. It has everything I wanted in the Z9, but in a size more compatible with my use. The Z8 was a tad cheaper, but not enough to be a deal breaker if I wanted the extra features the Z9 offers. The suite of available glass is the same for both bodies. For macro photography it’s all about a solid tripod and quality lighting IMO. Not too much money gets you some fairly high quality lighting. Jocke has some amazing watch photo’s here. You might want to PM him for starter kit advice. |
17 April 2024, 11:20 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,120
|
Quote:
I bought a Zf a year or two ago, but although it's a great camera, I just don't like mirrorless. Call me old fashioned. Everything I read about the Z9 is positive though, especially for video (which I don't do) so that's probably a good choice. It's really all about the glass though. The body, the sensor, that's all secondary. Good lenses make or break the image. I find that a 105mm is just about perfect for macro. I built a lightbox from an old cardboard box and some parchment paper. Seriously. I get a bit of yellow from the parchment, but that's adjustable with the WB.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
|
18 April 2024, 12:03 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,158
|
Figure out what focal length you want to shoot at and then look to see which lenses excel in that range. Many brands now have step down cameras that are meant for vlogging with much simpler video menus and features. This is not my ballgame, but I understand overheating can be the primary issue with many non-video centric models - at least as recently as two years ago when i last bought a body.
FWIW, I bought Sony for the lens selection, especially 3rd party options.
__________________
Jason 116610 LN DateJust Pelagos FXD |
18 April 2024, 12:21 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
For the OP. I stuck with Nikon glass. The 14-24 f2.8 s is the flattest WA zoom I’ve ever owned. The 24-70 f2.8 s is an amazing lens that gets the most out the sensor (the one must have in my bag). I use the 20mm f1.8 s for astrophotography and the 105 f2.8 VR S for macro. If you’re into wildlife or sports photography a buddy swears by the 70-200 f2.8 s. I have a Really Right Stuff ascend tripod with a ball head that works for pretty much everything I do. |
|
18 April 2024, 12:29 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,375
|
I once knew a guy who said Leica was the only way to go
|
18 April 2024, 02:23 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: us
Posts: 3,294
|
|
18 April 2024, 03:12 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Gregory LAUSCH
Location: Miami
Watch: FP Journe
Posts: 110
|
Thanks for the input guys, I’ll continue my research!
__________________
Curator of Exceptional contemporary & Vintage watches IG: @thesecondhandclub.official |
18 April 2024, 09:12 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,619
|
And back-ups to the back-ups were a “must have”.
__________________
WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719 |
18 April 2024, 12:49 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,937
|
I like the cooler, flatter light in the refrigerator...
I tried the freezer but my ice cream kept melting while I set up the shot. Just kidding of course - Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
18 April 2024, 01:14 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,200
|
Cameras
You cannot go wrong with Nikon, Canon or Sony. I use Sony. I think they are in front of the race in technology and have the best lens selection.
The Z9 is high on the food chain for a newbie. More entry level cameras will do just as well for thousands less. Use the savings on a watch! |
18 April 2024, 04:09 PM | #12 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,786
|
Quote:
I was thinking the same thing. That’s getting close to new watch money. I just bought a Leica V Lux 5, which is a bridge camera, with a lot of nice features and a very high quality lens. Check it out. Cost is 1/4 of what you’re thinking of buying. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
18 April 2024, 09:31 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
I started out with a small engine crate. A few splinters later I switched to the cardboard box. The box also folds up easily and stores neatly in the closet when not in use. |
|
18 April 2024, 09:38 PM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,937
|
New Camera Shopping for Watch photography & Videography
Yeah - I was just playing around with the appliance concept.
Now that you said cardboard, I think you meant a microwave oven box? I thought you meant the microwave itself! Missed the "box" part the first time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
18 April 2024, 09:44 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
The rule of thumb is to buy the best sensor/processor you can afford. Pair that with the best glass you can afford. A D9 and a couple good lenses will be less than a Sub if you shop around. And will be all the OP will need for many years to come. If the OP goes with the D8 the cost savings is a high quality tripod (expect to pay circa $1500 for a good tripod). |
|
18 April 2024, 09:49 PM | #16 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,937
|
New Camera Shopping for Watch photography & Videography
Quote:
That is a Lumix underneath the Leica skin that costs half as much. Not casting shade on the choice but a costly choice. It's still a good option for the OP. Both have the Leica glass, but it's a Panasonic base that Leica replaces with its own block logo, just above the lens barrel, as well as its red dot icon, also visible on the front. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
18 April 2024, 09:53 PM | #17 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,937
|
Oh how I miss "some of" those threads. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
19 April 2024, 08:55 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,170
|
I've been a Canon shooter since film days so that'll be my recommendation I suppose. I'm currently shooting and R5 and R7.
Both do great video also although the 8K from the R5 difficult to manage. The files are YUGE. This short clip was the R7. The still photo at the end was an iPhone shot. https://youtu.be/OnP-NlxJpcQ?si=As50JO2PuzHyipGV |
19 April 2024, 10:43 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
Problem with the advice of “buy best you can afford” is that when someone can “afford” really high-end cameras, it leads to buying more than most will likely ever utilize. Just my opinion. |
|
19 April 2024, 10:47 PM | #20 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,937
|
Quote:
Just for the avoidance of doubt, my advice was not to "buy best you can afford". I believe you should ride the tech curve and only spend reasonably. Thus the comment about going LUMIX vs Leica for same tech at half the price. Spend the difference on professional education in shooting and post-production. That knowledge stays with you for life while the old chassis go into the ash heap. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
19 April 2024, 10:50 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
|
|
20 April 2024, 06:02 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
|
|
21 April 2024, 05:12 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
Think about it. Does anyone say “don’t buy that iphone, it’s too much phone for you. It has features you’ll never use. Get the flip phone instead.” Resale on the Z9 and S lenses is pretty good. If the OP wants to walk away, the loss isn’t much different than flipping a watch. But, if the OP pursues photography, the Z9 will be an exceptional camera for many years to come. |
|
21 April 2024, 11:25 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Real Name: Casey
Location: El Norte
Watch: Speedy
Posts: 100
|
Just got a Leica Q3, sold off a bunch of gear it replaces. It is a 60mp, f1.7 fixed lens, 8k video, macro, tilt touchscreen….all in one compact beautiful body. I’m very pleased. Ive owned a lot of different cameras over the years.
It’s a one n done camera |
21 April 2024, 10:08 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,200
|
I disagree.
Quote:
|
|
22 April 2024, 12:35 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,900
|
I’m going to go a different way and tell you to look at a Panasonic if you want a strong video camera. The GH6 and the G9ii are their current flagships, the H is more video centric and the 9 more stills. Yes, I know it’s a M4/3 sensor, but this isn’t the M4/3 of a decade ago, and they shoot professional video on 4/3 all the time. As a bonus because of physics the lenses are smaller and cheaper. I use an Olympus/OM System OM1 for travel photography for the size and weight benefit. The cost savings is a bonus though. ;)
Give the new offerings a look before you dismiss it as “not full frame, so no good”.
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
22 April 2024, 01:09 AM | #27 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,786
|
Quote:
Exactly my thought. My iPhone 14 takes great shots, but I can certainly see the difference with the new Leica. I actually just got it, as my Birthday present to myself. All of my Nikon gear was stolen in a home invasion robbery last year. I’ve always loved photography, but this camera is enough for me. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
22 April 2024, 01:22 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,734
|
i'll take the other side of the debate. Get the new Hasselblad 907X 100c system and two or three of the best primes. May as well just go all in, plus Hasselblad is modular so easy to upgrade, or change up to old-school film.
Remember: Ilford B&W film is worth the effort :)
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
22 April 2024, 06:02 AM | #29 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,158
|
Quote:
__________________
Jason 116610 LN DateJust Pelagos FXD |
|
22 April 2024, 06:15 AM | #30 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,158
|
Quote:
Years ago, I read that about half of the people buying the high end cameras never take them off full auto. If someone is not already shooting aperture or shutter priority, utilizing ISO, experimenting with various video formats, enlarging to the size of a billboard, or needing the fastest buffering cameras in the world, then I honestly believe that most of the mid-tier levels are more than adequate at sometimes less than half the price. For me, I would rather spend my money on great lenses (okay, mid tier there as well) to match a good body. Currently, I use the Sony A7C with a mix of Sony G, Tamron and Samyang lenses. I get phenomenal results and have not once ever been limited by the onboard tech of the A7C as even it can do far more than I ever need.
__________________
Jason 116610 LN DateJust Pelagos FXD |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.