5167 vs. 5065 A-001

[sgfortino]

Originally Posted by adub206

Know this is an older thread, but I was in the same spot a few months ago. I felt like the 5167 would wear a bit big on my wrist.. even though I don’t mind my Speedmaster or old GMT Master II. I think it’s the integrated strap. So after thinking through it, I decided to get a 5066 instead. Here’s a pic on my roughly 7 in. wrist.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks great. Congrats!

[canthony]

I have a 5060a. Its fits my wrist perfectly. Are they as difficult to hunt down as the 5165? I would've though they are harder to find as only they were produced in limited numbers?

[mdtddd2007]

Let me see if I can help. As everyone has pointed out. The 5167A 40mm dial is exactly the same dial as 5165A 38mm. Here is my 5065/1A 38mm on bracelet along with a comparison 40mm 16570. I have a 6.5" wrist.

[fjkyle]

Originally Posted by adub206

Know this is an older thread, but I was in the same spot a few months ago. I felt like the 5167 would wear a bit big on my wrist.. even though I don’t mind my Speedmaster or old GMT Master II. I think it’s the integrated strap. So after thinking through it, I decided to get a 5066 instead. Here’s a pic on my roughly 7 in. wrist.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry to resurrect this, but this is a 5066 not a 5065?? It looks plenty big on your 7” wrist.