ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 March 2016, 03:17 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 23
|
Movement moving around the case?
Newbie here. Just purchased a older Datejust (16014) and brought it in for a service.
I just got a call back telling me that "when winding the crown the whole movement is moving around and the oscillating weight is spinning". I am not sure what that means and the watch was keeping perfect time. Does this make sense? Would this type of problem be corrected by a standard rebuild or would it require additional new parts to be ordered? Thanks for any help on this. This forum is a great community for Rolex lovers. |
23 March 2016, 05:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: London
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 115
|
Sounds like the clamps holding the movement in the body arn't tight. The oscillating weight is supposed to spin!!! that's how the watch winds
Who did you give it to for service?, the local car dealer? go get it back and take it to somebody who has seen an automatic watch before |
23 March 2016, 05:08 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 23
|
Thanks for the reply. I took it to the local Rolex AD for service. I forget how to diagram sentences, but I think he was implying that the oscillating weight was rotating when the crown is wound. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm far from an authority on the subject.
|
23 March 2016, 06:10 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 23
|
Spoke to the servicer again, and he indicated the entire movement inclusive of the oscillating weight was moving inside the case when the crown is wound.
He also told me that there were nicks on the hands and those would need to be replaced per Rolex specs because parts of the hands could "flake off" and get into the movement. He said they could not do the repair without replacing the hands. Does this part make any sense? |
27 March 2016, 04:47 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
I don't think the hands themselves will "flake" but the luminous material might, if it's in poor condition or has been damaged in some manner. |
|
27 March 2016, 10:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 23
|
Thanks for the reply. That makes sense.
Do you know if Rolex requires a change of hands if the lume has flaked off? I'd prefer to leave them original, but the AD told me they would have to do it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 March 2016, 11:27 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 586
|
Yes, if the hands are damaged or the lum is missing, Rolex will usually require that they be replaced.
|
23 May 2016, 07:57 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Michael
Location: Northern NM
Watch: Rolex 16610
Posts: 181
|
So go to a watchsmith that won't demand service that your not ok with. Its your watch and it certainly isnt under warranty any longer. Just choose your watch guy wisely.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk |
23 May 2016, 08:54 AM | #9 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,976
|
Quote:
A good choice is one that is cw21 certified. Rolex trained, and has a parts account. As for the hands, if they are truly flaking, you should replace them. That watch isn't rare and the phosphorus paint can cause a mess. The other option is re-luming them but has chance of something turning out poorly.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
18 June 2016, 01:35 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Margate
Watch: your back
Posts: 324
|
Sounds like your reverser wheels
Need either lubricating or replacing!!!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.