ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 December 2008, 11:25 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
|
$19,000 For A Watch W/ A Rubber Strap?!?
Okay, I'm all about "finer" things and respect products for their workmanship/materials/exclusivity.
I just don't understand how any person in their right mind would pay $19k for a watch that mimics a CHEAP Timex. Some Timex's look halfway decent and don't look like a gumball machine watch -- but this Patek sure takes the cake... So, if you had $19k to toss away and wanted a watch, would you EVER consider dropping that sort of time on this Patek? You gotta click the link; sorry, but it wouldn't let me C&P: http://www.feelgoodwatches.com/produ...oducts_id/3046
__________________
The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~
|
19 December 2008, 11:39 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
after a certain price-point (a few hundred), no watch purchase makes sense to people in their 'right minds'.
|
19 December 2008, 11:39 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Blackwood
Watch: ss gmt 11 c
Posts: 267
|
In one word - no.
|
19 December 2008, 06:51 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Henry
Location: CA, US
Watch: ing basketball
Posts: 2,977
|
Isn't that cheap compared to what the stainless bracelet version would cost? Just look at it as buying the head of the watch and they threw in the rubber strap. I've seen Rolex heads with a NATO go for 3 grand. It's Patek.
|
19 December 2008, 07:56 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Ignorance is no excuse really, Sterling, but...
I have a pair of Patek Aquanauts in my collection, a 5165 and a 5066, both smaller than the one in the link. I guess you just have to see one and handle one to appreciate it. The rubber strap is an integral part of the watch, in relation to the overall design. Observe the dial closely, and the relief on the strap and perhaps it'll make sense. There's also a relationship with the clasp, which is in my opinion, the finest deployant clasp every crafted. There are intangible things in a Patek that may not be obvious, nor should it be, to the average Rolex owner, but like all things, education is the first step to enlightenment. |
19 December 2008, 08:25 PM | #6 | |
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,387
|
Quote:
I had one on my wrist once and you just have to try it on to appreciate it. It was the most comfortable watch I've ever tried on. It's an amazing piece, IMO
__________________
JJ |
|
19 December 2008, 08:32 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
|
I am glad the neither one of those watches "does it for me" Though there are several PP that I would love to have.
~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
19 December 2008, 09:18 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Rubber straps seem to be everywhere - I saw a recent ad for a new Breitling for Bentley chrono (about $10k) with a standard rubber strap.
I don't have anything against rubber as a strap material per se, but I find it sticks to my wrist after a while so I then end up constantly fiddling with it... (I'm sure that some compounds are better than others in this regard though) Cheers
__________________
|
19 December 2008, 09:26 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
I would say that, yes, Patek Phil. Watches are very expensive, as are many other luxury watch brands. But, PP watches due tend to hold their value better than any watches out there.
PP make a good watch, and even though a rubber strap, it is of high quality. And lets be honest, to most spending that much on a PP, it is probably not that much money to them in the first place. That $20K watch to them, may be like many others buying a $200 watch. I have friends here in Thailand who drop $40k on a watch and do not even think about it. And I have a girlfriend who actually sells PP watches, along with other high end brands, and it is amazing- she will get customers that fly in from Japan or China, walk into the store and buy 2 or 3 PP without a blink. I can tell you, I have seen the Aquanaut up close, and it is a fantastic watch! If I was very rich, as most PP owners are, I would buy one. Actually in the luxury watch market, most watches start at $10K and go on up in price. |
20 December 2008, 02:03 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Quote:
I'd own one if they still carried the JLC movements inside. The new AP movements have been plagued by problems, and would be best to let them 'blood' before jumping on board. That said, the design doesn't do much for me, but oh, to have a JLC powered AP |
|
20 December 2008, 03:19 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
|
If you enjoy the watch, then that's all that counts!
I, personally, could not find myself owning a watch such as that one. FOR ME...well, it just does nothing for me. But, that's me, and it is a picture on the internet. If I had it in my hands, or on my wrist, then I may see something special about it, but, again, I, myself, don't think I could see $19,000 special. That's what's great about watches -- we can agree to disagree. Everyone has their own personal likes/dislikes. By no means to I see Rolex as an exclusive watch brand. There are many Pateks out there that are BEAUTIFUL watches! Would I ever own one? Nope. I don't make that kind of money, so I'll just have to be happy with my Rolex, Tags, and Tissot. One day...one day I'll get myself a Panerai; I kinda lust after one of those. Thanks for all the insight, everyone!
__________________
The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~
|
20 December 2008, 03:30 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
The Aquanaut is an incredible and beautiful watch. The only reason I would not pay that much for that rubber strap watch is simple: I cannot.
That's a little bit arrogant, though, in my opinion. But then again I'm just one of those average owners who can't observe the finer things in watches with certain names etched on them, right? |
20 December 2008, 03:31 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
This is a nice watch! Have you ever tryied it on? I have and I think it is a great watch. IMO Patek makes the best watches out there. I don't know if I would ever be able to afford one, but they are sure nice to look at! One of my friends is looking at spending 50K on one patek but he has a lots of spare cash. |
|
20 December 2008, 04:03 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: US
Watch: Me Now
Posts: 3,661
|
I only appreciated Patek from a distance until I tried them on. And the pricing used to seem exhorbitant. No, I do not like every model on my wrist, but I can honestly say the ones that smile back make me feel like I'm walking on air. They are stunning. I expect a picture of a Patek on the Internet conveys the depth and beauty of the watch about as effectively as a picture of any one of us does the same. In other words, it doesn't.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
20 December 2008, 07:52 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
I too was going to cite the AP ROOs as an example. Rubber may not impress the OP, but these ROOs are among the hottest sellers on the planet. To each is own, but there are many appealing facets to the watch business. I'd love to have a PP Nautilus one day.
|
20 December 2008, 10:18 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
|
Quote:
I wouldn't say that is arrogant, I would gather the OP is being arrogant with the fact that he is bashing a watch just because it has a rubber strap, without any research on the particular item. Patek's are amongst the finest watch brands in the world. You don't have to be a owner to appreciate the fine manufacturing qualities of the company. It's basically something you either get or you don't. Like the other poster said, for some of the elite individuals, they just don't care what material the product is made from, as long as they have that name brand item on their wrist. The previous said it best, to some the $20K Patek is like a $200 Timex. |
|
20 December 2008, 11:03 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
Many of their watches look like exquisite pieces of art. My point of the post was that this watch didn't look like your run-of-the-mill Patek and I just didn't see how anyone would actually justify that much money on a watch with so few "features" (as so I see it). No valuable metals, no elaborate bracelet, etc. I understand that it is still a Patek. I'm not ignorant; I'm just inquisitive.
__________________
The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~
|
|
20 December 2008, 12:43 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
|
Quote:
Without further adieu here is Bart Simpsons ass, |
|
20 December 2008, 07:25 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
The Aquanaut and the Royal Oak Offshore share a common DNA. Their individual predecessors, namely the Nautilus and Royal Oak respectively, were both designed by Gerald Genta, working for both Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet.
While it is totally feasible that the Aquanaut may be an ROO competitor, this likelihood is somewhat reduced by the fact that the ROO is a chronograph, and the Aquanaut a time and date piece. The Nautilus 5980 would be more likely competitor, with the edge going to the Nautilus in my books for sheer design values. I find the ROO simply to audacious and... in your face, as opposed to ass |
20 December 2008, 09:01 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
Intereseting thread.
At the end of the day it come's down to one's personal tastes. I'm not a big fan of either the Nautilus or ROO range of watches. But I do appreciate the fine craftmanship that it takes to build these watches. But then who's to say that my tastes will not change in the future. This time last year I had 2 Rolex watches and wouldn't consider any other brand. But now my eyes have been opened to a much larger range of watch brands. And I do now appreciate the finer things.
__________________
|
21 December 2008, 03:50 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,811
|
I had one and it was an amazing watch
and maybe those pics could change your mind As you can see I put it on a black croc strap. I don't like rubber straps |
21 December 2008, 09:16 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
Bruno
Those are fantastically detailed photos. I to would much prefer a leather strap then a rubber one. But then the rubber strap would be much more practical, if the watch was going to get a wet alot
__________________
|
21 December 2008, 11:10 AM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,503
|
That is a beautiful watch!
If I could justify buying one I would. I highly doubt Id ever sell it either unless it was trading up to another Patek. My father passed an Audemars Piguet down to me and Id like to add a Patek to that to pass down as well if I have a son.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
21 December 2008, 01:10 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
While a leather strap makes for a pleasant and attractive change-up on the Aquanaut, the original tropical strap with the chequered relief pattern complements the dial in a way that rounds off and completes the design. I would like to have a choice depending on the mood, like NATO vs Oyster bracelets
Looks great Bruno, when you gonna get another one ? |
21 December 2008, 01:46 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
|
Well, I must say, those pictures do a whole lot more justice than the one from the sight that I posted.
Still, if I, PERSONALLY, were to EVER spend that much on a watch, then I would want some precious metals involved just so I felt like I got something for my money. But, that's just me. Indeed, the attention to detail really shows in those photos. Thanks for sharing, and giving me more of an idea what one gets when he buys a Patek.
__________________
The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~
|
21 December 2008, 02:02 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,310
|
I'm far from an authority on Patek and I'm not really a fan of their designs but I seem to hear left and right about their quality and attention to detail. To be honest the dial of the Aquanaut that Unknown posted is not that impressive. I realize it is a macro pic but the numbers don't appear to be of a particularly high quality considering the price point and the fact that this is a Patek. These aren't extreme macro photos and they obviously show that Patek has its flaws as do many others.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
21 December 2008, 05:05 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
Quote:
http://www.ninanet.net/watches/other...s/mdufour.html There is very little like it in terms of quality and finishing. My dream and "grail" watch. Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
|
22 December 2008, 01:30 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,811
|
Quote:
When looking at those pics I think I can say the finishing is also PERFECT |
|
22 December 2008, 04:44 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
They are all beautiful but thanks for the PD link Terry. That's some workmanship.
|
22 December 2008, 09:50 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.