The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 August 2011, 09:28 AM   #61
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
Zenith D not so desirable,you can obtain one amytime you want,pricewise never went up so much as some speculated.reason since the 4130 is a better watch.
George

We all have our own opinions. I, and many others, would opt for a Zenith Daytona. The El Primero is an iconic movement. It is essentially unchanged since 1969. Very few watch movements, let alone chronographs, have the same history.

Just my opinion. Nothing antagonistic meant.

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2011, 10:47 AM   #62
hennabav
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbill2mrbill2 View Post
George

We all have our own opinions. I, and many others, would opt for a Zenith Daytona. The El Primero is an iconic movement. It is essentially unchanged since 1969. Very few watch movements, let alone chronographs, have the same history.

Just my opinion. Nothing antagonistic meant.

x2!!!
hennabav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2011, 03:33 AM   #63
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Nothing wrong we got different opinions,but the 4130 is a great stuff better than the EP in every aspect except it was created much earlier than the in house one.not more not less
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2011, 08:02 PM   #64
Ski Dweller
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aspen, CO
Watch: Swatch KikiPicasso
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
Nothing wrong we got different opinions,but the 4130 is a great stuff better than the EP in every aspect except it was created much earlier than the in house one.not more not less
Nah, the 4130 is the "simpler" movement where they marketed the cheapening of the movement as a move to create a more "robust" system. Really? Is your Zenith COSC movement falling apart? Mine isn't. It's more accurate than my recently serviced "in house" Sea Dweller. I'm for the Zenith, because it's better. Rolex couldn't modify enough of them to keep up with the demand of the Daytona. That out to tell ya that they made MORE of the post Zenith Daytonas, and in an attempt to mask this massive production, they tried to create a waiting list sales and "safe to customer" type no-see-um sales.

Dealers keep the SS Daytona in a safe because they perceive its value to be headed north. Dealers aren't carrying much GOLD in their stores right now at 18-24K because they don't want to be stuck with inventory in a falling gold market. You tend to order from a catalogue so they don't have to pony up for the gold. NOW, they are buying gold from anyone and sending it off to melt, but not selling it. It is strange to see gold headed from our necks and fingers off to a vault where an ETF stores it. Messed up.
Ski Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 05:17 AM   #65
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski Dweller View Post
Nah, the 4130 is the "simpler" movement where they marketed the cheapening of the movement as a move to create a more "robust" system. Really? Is your Zenith COSC movement falling apart? Mine isn't. It's more accurate than my recently serviced "in house" Sea Dweller. I'm for the Zenith, because it's better. Rolex couldn't modify enough of them to keep up with the demand of the Daytona. That out to tell ya that they made MORE of the post Zenith Daytonas, and in an attempt to mask this massive production, they tried to create a waiting list sales and "safe to customer" type no-see-um sales.

Dealers keep the SS Daytona in a safe because they perceive its value to be headed north. Dealers aren't carrying much GOLD in their stores right now at 18-24K because they don't want to be stuck with inventory in a falling gold market. You tend to order from a catalogue so they don't have to pony up for the gold. NOW, they are buying gold from anyone and sending it off to melt, but not selling it. It is strange to see gold headed from our necks and fingers off to a vault where an ETF stores it. Messed up.
Sorry pal,but it s general consensus among watchmakers/connoisseurs that 4130 is a better one,however the EP was a great one too.
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 05:21 AM   #66
Ski Dweller
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aspen, CO
Watch: Swatch KikiPicasso
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
Sorry pal,but it s general consensus among watchmakers/connoisseurs that 4130 is a better one,however the EP was a great one too.
Nah. In any event there are tons of 4130's out there, and they're getting cheaper.
Ski Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 05:48 AM   #67
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 993
I think we are all agreed on this forum that the vast majority of Daytona owners out there would not have a clue about any of the points being raised here, i have spken to many, and as soon as you start mentioning model numbers, Dial variations, EP. movement, In house movement etc. it's as if your speaking a different language; the point i am making is that we are only really preaching to the converted.( Which i really enjoy )
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 06:50 AM   #68
improviz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsio View Post
Might even be some people trading up for the new SS Daytona when it comes out, which may lead to a drop in 116520 value temporarily.

Sub-C has not done much to help the 16610 thus far, and the 16613 has been gone a while now with prices still softening in spite of some strong support in the forums. Have this feeling the 116523 could end up being the cheapest of all Daytonas with time.
Actually 16613 prices have been on the upswing; when I got mine a few years ago, the pre-owned models were selling at or near the $5.5K mark, whereas these days I've seen them topping $7K. Ditto the SS subs, which were around the $4700 mark back then but again I've seen them go in the mid 5's now. So I don't think the SS will be taking a dive anytime soon when even the diver's watches haven't!!
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.
improviz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2011, 07:10 AM   #69
Dweller of the Sea
"TRF" Member
 
Dweller of the Sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingMoose View Post
When Rolex switches over to the ceramic bezels, I bet the value of all the metal-bezel ones skyrockets...
I don´t think so.
This model has been made since 2000, and the steel ceramic will probably be available from 2013. Thats 14 years of manufacture, and that will not make it very rare. Its not even rare now.
Dweller of the Sea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 09:04 AM   #70
HardTxRider
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wimberley, TX
Posts: 1
Hello gang,

I'm new to the forum and am glad I looked around before making what might be a big mistake.

I bought new in 2000 a Rolex Daytona Stainless # Gold 116523 with a white face. I wore it for years with a great deal of pleasure. Once I retired from business life my activities changed and wearing such a beautiful watch became worrisome. I sent it in for factory refurbish/maintenance and with it came back if was like new. I wore it a few times to social occasions but it has manly stayed in the box.

Recently I've been lusting for a new or pre-owned late model GMT Master II in stainless and gold. I was going to put the Daytona up on the market to cash it out and buy the GMT Master II. I have not found the right deal and am waffling big time about selling the Daytona.

The most favorable market I found was Bob's Watches that you are probably already familiar. I have the original wooden box, serial number/model number tag, certified tag, polishing cloth, user's guide and other documentation that came with the piece.

What do you all think?

Tim
HardTxRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 09:16 AM   #71
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingMoose View Post
When Rolex switches over to the ceramic bezels, I bet the value of all the metal-bezel ones skyrockets...

I think that is true for all of them...I was at and AD today and still not a fan of the ceramic...unless there is French Onion Soup in it. You know the one with the bread and all the cheese?!


Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 09:30 AM   #72
ufboy73
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
mmmmm, hungry
ufboy73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 09:49 AM   #73
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingMoose View Post
When Rolex switches over to the ceramic bezels, I bet the value of all the metal-bezel ones skyrockets...
Just like the value of the metal bezel GMT's skyrocketed? Or the LV's? Well, not so much. They've simply continued to go up with the overall rise of Rolex prices, but nothing ridiculous.
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 09:58 AM   #74
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Just like the value of the metal bezel GMT's skyrocketed? Or the LV's? Well, not so much. They've simply continued to go up with the overall rise of Rolex prices, but nothing ridiculous.
I don't know about the LV's...if I hadn't ran into one at an AD for original list (around $5100) last month I wouldn't have bought one. They are like 6 to 8k on eBay etc for used ones!


Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 10:01 AM   #75
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
I don't know about the LV's...if I hadn't ran into one at an AD for original list (around $5100) last month I wouldn't have bought one. They are like 6 to 8k on eBay etc for used ones!
Congratz to you on the find, and you're lucky your AD didn't just keep replacing price tags as the price went up, as most do. Since your plain SS Expy's and Sub's are all selling in the slightly over $7k range now (excluding any Memorial Day price hikes that may have been seen), then yeah that's about the range they're running in. But being metal vs. ceramic didn't send the price soaring.
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 10:03 AM   #76
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
@ Timber Loftis

Ok I agree. I guess only time will tell...
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 10:07 AM   #77
zeuloa
"TRF" Member
 
zeuloa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Congratz to you on the find, and you're lucky your AD didn't just keep replacing price tags as the price went up, as most do. Since your plain SS Expy's and Sub's are all selling in the slightly over $7k range now (excluding any Memorial Day price hikes that may have been seen), then yeah that's about the range they're running in. But being metal vs. ceramic didn't send the price soaring.
You were lucky. I believe the last price was $6400!
zeuloa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 10:08 AM   #78
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
@ Timber Loftis

Ok I agree. I guess only time will tell...
Oh, I think in time -- great time -- the metal LV's will be seen as a catch. They had a fairly limited run, and were an anniversary watch design. Let's hope they find a way to cock-up the green hand/ceramic GMT's (highly unlikely), then I'll be happy too.
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 10:18 AM   #79
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Congratz to you on the find, and you're lucky your AD didn't just keep replacing price tags as the price went up, as most do. Since your plain SS Expy's and Sub's are all selling in the slightly over $7k range now (excluding any Memorial Day price hikes that may have been seen), then yeah that's about the range they're running in. But being metal vs. ceramic didn't send the price soaring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeuloa View Post
You were lucky. I believe the last price was $6400!
Really? I guess I did get lucky. I wondered if they were mistaken...
I bought it so fast I think they thought I was up to something!!!!
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 10:28 AM   #80
Yoda
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
Total opposite for me. I have sold my all yg daytona last week and waiting for the new ceramic yg daytona on bracelet.
Yoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2011, 12:22 PM   #81
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Just like the value of the metal bezel GMT's skyrocketed? Or the LV's? Well, not so much. They've simply continued to go up with the overall rise of Rolex prices, but nothing ridiculous.
X2... they will NOT skyrocket... IMHO, they will hold, dip, increase, hold, dip, increase.....
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2011, 02:55 PM   #82
Geronomo12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York
Watch: IWC Amalfi Platinu
Posts: 65
As an owner of a SS Daytona with the Rokex movement and white dial, I would love to see Rolex switch to a ceramic bezel. It would make my watch more valuable and who doesn't like having something that he loves grow more valuable? If Rolex really wants to help my watch grow in value, they should stop making the white dial as well. Just dreaming.
Geronomo12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2011, 03:26 PM   #83
Rani Drama
"TRF" Member
 
Rani Drama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
I was thinking of picking up a Daytona as well. My AD always holds a couple older models and asks rolex to send any new old stock to him all the time. All of his current models are discounted generously except for the daytona and once a model gets discontinued it's full list for those models. He sold the last sea dweller he had at full the other day.
__________________
Rani Drama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2011, 04:55 PM   #84
masterkiller
"TRF" Member
 
masterkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM...
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by esm View Post
yes sir - im holding onto it now..... whats next?

Could it be a new Hype ;-)

/masterkiller
__________________
Rolex - SubC...
AP - Diver...
Panerai - PAM380
Omega - Speedy PRO
masterkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2011, 07:16 AM   #85
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
IMHO the 4030 is far better than the in-house 4130. Rolex made it cheaper not better!
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2011, 07:35 AM   #86
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
I think that is true for all of them...I was at and AD today and still not a fan of the ceramic...unless there is French Onion Soup in it. You know the one with the bread and all the cheese?!


Looooooooove French onion soup. Don't care for pottery though
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2011, 07:40 AM   #87
scarab007
"TRF" Member
 
scarab007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Fran
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 385
I am keeping mine, but I like the watch and have not really thought of it as an investment. If it goes up in value, even better!
scarab007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2011, 07:40 AM   #88
GolfPunk
"TRF" Member
 
GolfPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,395
Rolexes, including Daytonas will continue to grow in value - FACT
GolfPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2011, 07:44 AM   #89
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingMoose View Post
When Rolex switches over to the ceramic bezels, I bet the value of all the metal-bezel ones skyrockets...
That is not necessarily a correct statement...

Regardless, I sold mine. I'm just not a chrono guy in real life, somehow I prefer them more on photos!?
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2011, 07:59 AM   #90
Mutlu
"TRF" Member
 
Mutlu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dweller of the Sea View Post
I don´t think so.
This model has been made since 2000, and the steel ceramic will probably be available from 2013. Thats 14 years of manufacture, and that will not make it very rare. Its not even rare now.
x2
Mutlu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.