ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 October 2017, 02:01 AM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Baltimore
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 311
|
Of course the DJ is a dressier watch and there are a lot of other dressier watches out there, but the Sub, and especially the ceramic ones, is a dressy looking watch. Hence the description versatile that has followed this watch everywhere.
|
5 October 2017, 03:19 AM | #122 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
I think very little difference is made here between (i) a suit, where in our day, we’d have to admit, pretty much any watch is admissible, and (ii) black tie, where would be poor form to wear any watch. For what good is knowing the time when one is enjoying whatever function commends a tux.
And while those various Rolex ambassadors or Danny Craig may not look silly with their bow ties out, shilling product on one’s wrist at any real world black tie event outside of Hollywood would hardly qualify as polite.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
5 October 2017, 03:37 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
As long as the king of Norway (Harald Rex) can wear his GMT Master 1675 to formal events like May 17th in Norway - I rest my case.
And he also wears it at other formal events too. Here it is when it was fresh: And the insert today is faded to absolute ghost... See here on Jake's: http://www.rolexmagazine.com/2017/02...harald-of.html |
5 October 2017, 04:11 AM | #124 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 605
|
Nice mic drop !
There can be no better example to proof that you can now wear whatever you like. We know now that traditionally, to wear no watch is required, but who cares anymore ? Today you can wear a orange Omega Co-Axial and some will find it trendy. Wear a SS bracelet and you will see some rolling eyes. Wear a dress watch, it's still a watch. Wear no watch and some will say:" look at him, he don't even have a watch.". To each his own. |
5 October 2017, 04:22 AM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Watch: Omega
Posts: 824
|
Absolutely. Here's the secret - no one cares! Wear what you enjoy.
|
5 October 2017, 04:44 AM | #126 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,434
|
+1 for wearing whatever you want....but I definitely have other preferences than a sub for formal wear. Wouldn't ding someone for it though if they did it....I've seen classic Casios with suits and I don't think there's much wrong with that.
|
5 October 2017, 04:54 AM | #127 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Florida
Posts: 278
|
Ill be wearing it casual...sport and suited up
|
5 October 2017, 05:04 AM | #128 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 400
|
Got new french cuff shirts so could wear DSSD every day
People don't notice anyway, and any sports Rolex will look better than an Apple watch |
5 October 2017, 07:11 AM | #129 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,585
|
This comes up in one form or another on every watch forum every so often. It always goes the same.
Dive watches are not dress watches so some of us simply think it's a combination we wouldn't make for ourselves and are very unlikely to be convinced otherwise. Others think it's fine or even believe they are trend setters. They will also not change their minds. Some boldly say they not only wear dive watches with a suit, they wear plastic watches with a Tux. These people just might be trying a little too hard. I don't think any of us care what anyone else does. Like many I am in the camp of "not something I'd do but you can do whatever you want". The original question was actually "Is it a dress watch?"....No, it absolutely isn't. "Can I wear it with a suit?"....Of course you can, and nobody will likely notice, care or question it. |
5 October 2017, 07:21 AM | #130 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Martin
Location: Kenilworth , UK
Watch: The Bluesy!
Posts: 328
|
Yes!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
__________________
"Time will continue to move forward, whether you choose to make something of it or not" |
5 October 2017, 08:03 AM | #131 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Long Island NY US
Watch: 1675 14060M 16622
Posts: 507
|
Yes.
__________________
Rolex, Omega, Panerai, Chopard, Blancpain, Breitling, Seiko, Zenith, IWC, Tag Heuer, Bvlgari, Cartier, Movado, Tissot, Casio and Sinn, a few of my favorite things |
5 October 2017, 09:00 AM | #132 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: POLAND
Watch: BLRO
Posts: 615
|
I just went to a wedding...wore a suit..didn't think twice about wearing my SD.
|
5 October 2017, 09:35 AM | #133 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: OC
Posts: 3
|
The sub is one of the most versatile watches. Goes well with a white t-shirt and jeans and peaking under a nice shirt cuff. Even looks good when in the buff (jk) Can't go wrong...
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
5 October 2017, 10:52 AM | #134 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 470
|
Wear the sea dweller for casual and with suits,
|
5 October 2017, 11:58 AM | #135 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,803
|
Quote:
James Bond (for the previous generation) and the shiny ceramic bezel (for this generation) disagree with you. |
|
5 October 2017, 12:07 PM | #136 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: US
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 272
|
No way, need an excuse to buy another watch! 'Shucks a Sub isn't proper for wearing with a suit in this situation, I need to look at the PP site again.' :)
|
5 October 2017, 12:23 PM | #137 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,585
|
It's clearly an attractive and luxurious watch and yes it doesn't look completely out of place with a suit. I get it, but it's all that while still being a dive watch at it's core. Are you suggesting you would put it in the dress watch and not the dive watch category?
|
5 October 2017, 12:38 PM | #138 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 590
|
Do you wear SUBs, as a dress watch?
My contribution to absolutely yes!
|
5 October 2017, 01:07 PM | #139 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: LA
Watch: Rolex(4),15400
Posts: 1,105
|
Of course you can wear a sports rolex to a formal event. It goes with everything suit, tux, casual wear.
|
5 October 2017, 02:04 PM | #140 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
Whether it's appropriate to wear with a suit may be a matter of opinion, whether it's a dress watch is not. I wouldn't wear a Sub with a tux any more than I'd wear a Calatrava sport fishing. |
|
5 October 2017, 02:14 PM | #141 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Andre
Location: Delaware
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 296
|
Lots of good arguments on both sides of the aisle. I always say, "Wear what you like and like what you wear." A wise man once said, "Life is not a dress rehearsal."
__________________
–Andre´ |
5 October 2017, 02:24 PM | #142 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
|
One thing that does bug me: the idea that an expensive watch is a substitute for dressing well
My take is that if someone doesn't care enough to read and follow the dress code, then they are disrespecting the host. However, watches are not relevant to modern dress codes IMO I kicked a guest out of my wedding for wearing a short sleeve polo and no jacket. "Seriously, man? Just because of my outfit?" Yeah, dude. Seriously. |
5 October 2017, 03:15 PM | #143 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Watch: Sub, DJ41, CHNR an
Posts: 468
|
Yep, all the time. Good more casual alternate to my normal JLC
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
5 October 2017, 04:45 PM | #144 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: UK
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 424
|
I only got my sub date less than a month ago and have worn it every single day with absolutely everything.
I personally find that because of the shiny ceramic bezel and shiny crystal glass it actually looks more "dressy" than "sporty". |
5 October 2017, 05:13 PM | #145 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
Watch categories used to reflect categories of what a watch could be used for: a dive watch is at least 100m water resistant with (usually) a bezel and could be taken underwater by a diver; a pilot's watch is big and legible and is useful (apparently) when doing what a pilot did when pilots needed big watches; a chronograph, well, has a chronograph, and with a tachymeter can time race cars. With dive computers, digital timers etc. those previous tool categories are just vestige terms of the original purpose. To say something was a pilot watch doesn't mean one would look ridiculous wearing one if one wasn't a pilot, just that back in the day if you were a test pilot having a big watch was useful so you would go to the store and buy a pilot watch. A 'dress' watch is just a catch-all term for a watch that looks more elegant than a standard tool watch and has no historical specific job function. It doesn't mean that if a guy is getting dressed up, he needs to go buy a dress watch like a pilot would buy a pilot watch for his job. To say that is to let a marketing category dictate reality. It's like saying a doctor shouldn't wear a Brooks Brothers regent fit suit because he is a doctor and not a regent. Men have been wearing watches en masse since around the WWI/WWII, and by 1965 Rolex was being advertised as something a man could wear with a suit, so that's like 57 out of 80-100 years that wearing a tool watch with a suit has been a thing for men to do (and since dive watches as we know them today weren't around until the early 1950s, that's almost the entire life of dive watches). Some watch people and the occasional cranky fashion writer may complain about it, but it's as relevant as complaining about the d$#n kids listening rock -n- roll and waiting for it to go away and for things to get back to normal. Not sure why I end up posting so much about this, it must be some kind of mental disorder I have (-:. |
|
5 October 2017, 06:43 PM | #146 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,637
|
Personally I'd prefer something with a bit more sparkle for dress. Likely a DJ, DD or their ilk.
|
6 October 2017, 01:25 AM | #147 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
I wear it most of the time with casual or sport dressy.
But it's most versatile watch |
6 October 2017, 11:26 PM | #148 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I have worn my sub with a suit but usually I'll wear either my datejust or explorer with a suit.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
7 October 2017, 02:23 AM | #149 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Sydney
Posts: 186
|
Yes. I wear it for every occassion
__________________
Current watches: Hulk, 16710 Pepsi, seiko Blumo SBDC003, Omega Bond Blue, Datejust, SARB035, Seiko SNP065, G-Shock, Aqua Terra Blue Bond Past watches: GMT2C, Daytona Black, Planet Ocean Seamaster, Datejust, 116610ln |
7 October 2017, 11:36 AM | #150 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Vincent B
Location: New York, NY
Watch: '06 GMT Master II
Posts: 1,261
|
I'm with you.
__________________
Wearing Today: * Seiko SRP777 (2017) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.