The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 April 2023, 08:48 AM   #121
Ruvv
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: USA
Watch: 126710
Posts: 279
Please do
Ruvv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2023, 09:08 AM   #122
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osmin View Post
Quick update: pulled the trigger on a 124060. Should arrive next week. The 14060M is still in my collection. Let’s see which watch wins the race. Or if I need both.

100000% a good move. 114060 is by far worst sub ever made IMO. Only 116xxx ceramic diver worth owning is SD4K.

The 124xxx are all really well done.

Congrats and enjoy!
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2023, 10:37 AM   #123
mr_gray
"TRF" Member
 
mr_gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: steve
Location: sydney
Watch: SMURF
Posts: 653
one of the more interesting elements of this thread are the thoughts on bracelet. some people seem to think the 5 series watches have a crappy bracelet. with 6 digit bracelets in the main being seen as a big improvement.

i wonder how many people who think the 5 series bracelet is bad have owned one and worn it?

i started with a 114060 and then a 116610lv and then a 116619lb. i found these watches beautiful and functional etc. but the bracelets would wear me down. immovable objects compared to my wrist.

i eventually ended up with a 16618lb and loved the "tuna can" bracelet immediately. much less able to be altered than 6 digit bracelet but "better" for me in any case.

i now have a 16750 and am shooketh at how comfortable it is. thin profile, svelte bracelet with even more comfort than the 5 digit sub.

ultimately larger profile height and weight create an issue that a bracelet has to address. this creates the need for a snugness and this in turn creates need for adjustability (especially for those in humid climates). imo best to keep weight and height minimal and take strain off bracelet issue. 6 digit subs go the other way and in my experience it was not ideal. it does feel solid though and that can be nice.
mr_gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2023, 08:07 PM   #124
Osmin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brny11 View Post
100000% a good move. 114060 is by far worst sub ever made IMO. Only 116xxx ceramic diver worth owning is SD4K.

The 124xxx are all really well done.

Congrats and enjoy!
I had exactly the same feeling after trying the 12xxxx at the dealer. Love at first sight. I had the 114060 for two years, never really liked how it was sitting on my wrist and moved then to the 14060M.
Osmin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2023, 08:40 PM   #125
RFC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Puerto Rico
Watch: 1968 5513 Sub
Posts: 450
A straight trade that also makes you happy, go for it. As for me owning both, the M is the one to keep.
RFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2023, 11:49 PM   #126
Big Tex Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osmin View Post
Quick update: pulled the trigger on a 124060. Should arrive next week. The 14060M is still in my collection. Let’s see which watch wins the race. Or if I need both.
Please post pictures when you get your new watch … side by side, if possible.
Big Tex Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 12:05 AM   #127
wgdaytona
2024 Pledge Member
 
wgdaytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 870
Do it, you'll be happy. One day a few years down the road you'll have a nostalgic feeling and some extra $ and you'll go out and try to find a high condition 14060M. Good luck with that.
wgdaytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 12:31 AM   #128
Agamemnon
"TRF" Member
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Real Name: Giuliano
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex - Panerai
Posts: 1,976
I keep my 124060.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2023-04-02 Rolex Submariner 41 mm 124060.jpg (278.7 KB, 62 views)
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 12:42 AM   #129
PepsiBezel
2024 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_gray View Post
one of the more interesting elements of this thread are the thoughts on bracelet. some people seem to think the 5 series watches have a crappy bracelet. with 6 digit bracelets in the main being seen as a big improvement.

i wonder how many people who think the 5 series bracelet is bad have owned one and worn it?

i started with a 114060 and then a 116610lv and then a 116619lb. i found these watches beautiful and functional etc. but the bracelets would wear me down. immovable objects compared to my wrist.

i eventually ended up with a 16618lb and loved the "tuna can" bracelet immediately. much less able to be altered than 6 digit bracelet but "better" for me in any case.

i now have a 16750 and am shooketh at how comfortable it is. thin profile, svelte bracelet with even more comfort than the 5 digit sub.

ultimately larger profile height and weight create an issue that a bracelet has to address. this creates the need for a snugness and this in turn creates need for adjustability (especially for those in humid climates). imo best to keep weight and height minimal and take strain off bracelet issue. 6 digit subs go the other way and in my experience it was not ideal. it does feel solid though and that can be nice.
These are all great points. I wore a 16710 for about 15 years, then moved to modern 6-digit references including a 114060 and 124060.

I have since moved back to 5-digits as my favorites to wear daily.

I like to wear my watches very tight, and while the glidelock makes that easy to do, I found the lightness and flexibility of the 5-digit bracelets preferable. The hollow links have a slight give to them, that allows for a lot of comfort when wearing for long periods of time.
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2023, 02:03 AM   #130
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brny11 View Post
100000% a good move. 114060 is by far worst sub ever made IMO. Only 116xxx ceramic diver worth owning is SD4K.

The 124xxx are all really well done.

Congrats and enjoy!
Opinions vary!
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M
(Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros)
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2023, 09:44 PM   #131
Osmin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Tex Rolex View Post
Please post pictures when you get your new watch … side by side, if possible.
Please see new thread here and I would be happy if the discussion continues there

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=899252
Osmin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2023, 09:55 PM   #132
cdm765
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Cameron
Location: Canada
Watch: All of them
Posts: 694
I sold my 14060m when I got my 126710. I’d do it again in a heartbeat.
cdm765 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.