The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Reference Library

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 September 2008, 01:12 PM   #1
ASH
"TRF" Member
 
ASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: El Paso
Watch: PAM 233
Posts: 559
Got my SDDS today. My first Role, and I really like the size and the fact that I am the first in El Paso with this baby
ASH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 02:28 AM   #2
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
More Bracelet / Clasp photos:








__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2013, 02:12 AM   #3
steveclocks
"TRF" Member
 
steveclocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnEaton View Post
More Bracelet / Clasp photos:








Marvellous photos of the bracelet/clasp!
fine mecanical stuff, well made
steveclocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2008, 08:22 AM   #4
momac
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 69
Thanks for sharing the pics.
momac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2008, 06:06 AM   #5
Got Rolex?
"TRF" Member
 
Got Rolex?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 31
Great info - Thanks.
Got Rolex? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2009, 03:05 PM   #6
hflee55
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
Great info. Makes me appreciate my DSSD even more.
hflee55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2009, 03:36 PM   #7
Time_4_Time
"TRF" Member
 
Time_4_Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 3
Has anyone else read that The deepsea was actualy tested at 4200M, but rolex only warrantys the watch for the rated depth on the dial?
Time_4_Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2009, 08:55 PM   #8
Fred_Tan
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred Tan
Location: Singapore
Watch: Bumble Bee
Posts: 668
I find DSSD bracelets taper a little too much or too little

I wish they made a thicker and wider strap or bracelets
Fred_Tan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2009, 12:22 AM   #9
TempoKing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
The older I get...the more I learn
TempoKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2009, 07:57 AM   #10
umster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London U.K
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 167
Brillant post larry, excellent reading and now my understanding of this watch is better.. I want one!!!!
umster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 02:33 AM   #11
tthopp05
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
You will be very happy with the DEEPSEA,welcome to the club
tthopp05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2009, 11:30 PM   #12
adam69sun
"TRF" Member
 
adam69sun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Sun
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex,Candino
Posts: 45
Flip-lock and easylock is rolex new design.
Now,I find other flip-lock and easylock to use leather bracelet.
__________________
My First Lover is ZENITH Open T 40mm
But Now is 116710 and 1601 ~
adam69sun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 03:37 AM   #13
sexner
"TRF" Member
 
sexner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
Very nice post. Hey Dan - the writing is on the rehaut not the chapter ring. The chapter ring is on the dial where the indicies are.
__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established.
sexner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2009, 11:53 PM   #14
bahamadoug
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Douglas
Location: nassau, bahamas
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 33
I really am very attached to my DSSD that I bought in late Feb 09. It has great presence and personality. However, I have growing concern about the ceramic bezel insert that I hear is very brittle and prone to shattering. I have also read in other posts that the insert can move around within the bezel metal housing!! I would have thought that the DSSD which is touted as being the ulimate dive tool watch (and certainly looks the part) would be reliably constructed in such a way as to withstand just about anything thrown at it. Deep sea divers don't need to be conserned with their equipment failing or being prone to easy damage. They can't be nursemaiding their watch which is one of the most important safety devices they have. Just imagine, one is at depth using your watch to time your dive and decompression ascent. You look at your watch to determine where you are with your dive and you find that the insert has dropped out or has shattered???!!!! Can anyone give us some comfort and reassurance that the DSSD is more robust than what we are hearing???? Any and all posts would be much appreciated. At this point I am even considering flipping my DSSD
bahamadoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2009, 09:10 AM   #15
snapster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: hong kong
Posts: 62
i checked out this watch this past week and compared it to my panerai 212... the size of the case is pretty much the same so I wouldn't worry about the size if any of you own or have owned a panerai in the past. this is definitely on my "to buy" list now. :) might have to wait until next year though, other projects require funds first. :(
snapster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 July 2009, 11:51 AM   #16
bartonjet
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Watch: vintage gilt subs
Posts: 61
awesome post Larry!

The saga of the Sea-Dweller continues!!!!

(perhaps the dive watch with the most history and cult following of all time)
bartonjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2009, 06:58 PM   #17
The Rolex Shark
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: So Calli
Posts: 27
This is by far the best thing i read all year!
The Rolex Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2009, 08:25 AM   #18
shawnfb
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DEEP SEA V
Posts: 103
great stuff!!!
shawnfb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2009, 06:09 PM   #19
inspires
"TRF" Member
 
inspires's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 1665
Posts: 1,495
Fantastic information. For those of you that haven't seen this beauty in person, the pictures really don't do it any justice
inspires is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2009, 08:41 PM   #20
miamiman
"TRF" Member
 
miamiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: wil
Location: miami,fl
Watch: rolex 1675
Posts: 146
ok that watch looks like it weighs 20 pounds ,does anybody here wear one as a daily watch. let us know and i would love to see some pics of it on the wrist
miamiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2009, 01:25 AM   #21
Robin_NL
"TRF" Member
 
Robin_NL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116600
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by miamiman View Post
ok that watch looks like it weighs 20 pounds ,does anybody here wear one as a daily watch. let us know and i would love to see some pics of it on the wrist
Like this?


I love the DS, but I have a question, the last few weeks it's losing about 10 seconds/24h, and that's too much imo. So if my ad recalibrates it(Microstella etc), how long does it take to do that compared to normal oystercases(my ex 16610- Subdate took about half an hour to recalibrate)

Cheers Robin from the Netherlands
Robin_NL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2009, 09:58 PM   #22
xbox
"TRF" Member
 
xbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beach in the Med
Watch: Hunting ...
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by miamiman View Post
ok that watch looks like it weighs 20 pounds ,does anybody here wear one as a daily watch. let us know and i would love to see some pics of it on the wrist
I wear daily, for a week or so, in rotation with all my watches.

No issues whatsoever regarding weight, height or size, but boy, does it attract some serious attention
xbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2009, 01:11 AM   #23
tthopp05
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
Thanks Tools.
tthopp05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2009, 10:52 PM   #24
Nick1959
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 558
I got it a few days ago and it wears comfortably on my wrist.
Nick1959 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2010, 01:47 PM   #25
David Maddern
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Hi Larry,

How are you ?

Can you please tell me, if you know of course ? Is the current Deep sea ( 2009 / 2010 manufacture ) larger than when the watch was first released ? The reason i ask is that your post claims the deep sea is 43mm and the Rolex website today claims the deep sea to be 44mm ?

Thanks in advance Larry .

Kind regards

David
David Maddern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2010, 03:54 PM   #26
Gagebuilder
"TRF" Member
 
Gagebuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
Hello, David, and welcome to the forum!

There has been no size change to the DSSD. For whatever reason, likely marketing, Rolex said the first releases were 43 mm and has since decided to call the latest model 44 mm, even though they are exactly the same size.

I am not 100% sure when DSSD production started and was released to the public. The only difference in releases is the letter that the serial number starts with. Some are "M" serial which Rolex started using in mid 2007, but I think the DSSD was not actually released until early 2008, and newer ones are "V" serial which started mid 2008, but they are still identical watches.

I hope this helps, and I am enjoying mine.

Last edited by Gagebuilder; 25 January 2010 at 04:19 PM.. Reason: adding
Gagebuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2010, 11:08 AM   #27
David Maddern
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Hi Doug and thanks for your kind reply ,

I appreciate very much the information you have offered .

Can you also confirm the actual size of the watch as an owner ? Its killing me to know the real size

thanks in advance

David
David Maddern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2010, 05:29 PM   #28
Gagebuilder
"TRF" Member
 
Gagebuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
Sure! I have not done this yet. I have calipers, at work so I'll get back to you with what I find.
Gagebuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2010, 06:19 PM   #29
Gagebuilder
"TRF" Member
 
Gagebuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
Wow, I know see how Rolex is playing with the size numbers of this watch. The easy numbers:

Bezel diameter=43.05mm
Thickness=17.70mm
Width over crown=47.84mm
Case "length", lug tip at 12 side to lug tip at 6 side=51.96mm
---(case is over 2 inches tall)
overall case width, including crown guard=45.5mm

Now, I played around quite a bit with the case measuring and it is a bit subjective as the case is tapered. That is, the case is a bit wider where the case is nearest to the wrist and it tapers as it goes to the bezel. If you go by the bezel, it is definitely a 43 mm watch.The case is 44 mm wide from the gas escape valve to the start of the radius for the crown guard, well approximately. Measuring from 2 o'clock to 10 o'clock, the narrowest part af the case, the thickest part is about 44.5 mm and the narrowest point as about 43.2 mm.

This was pretty neat, examining my dssd this way.
Gagebuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2010, 11:06 PM   #30
David Maddern
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Icon20

Hi Doug,

I cant thank you enough , i was going around the bend trying to find this information and was getting nowhere . I must say I'm relieved also to here its 44mm + ( at least somewhere ) as a large watch is what the deepsea should be .

I should imagine Larry will also appreciate you going to so much trouble and perhaps he will include your findings in his fantastic initial thread ?

I'm even more jealous of your deepsea now and hope you get many years of pleasure glancing at the time .

sincerely

David
David Maddern is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.