ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 December 2007, 08:41 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Review of the SS Daytona (Ref. 116520)
The Daytona with the in-house movement Cal. 4130 was introduced at the Basel World Fair in year 2000.
The predecessor was the Daytona with modified Zenith El Primero movt. Cal. 4030 (introduced in 1988). Rolex heavily modified the Zenith E.P. movt., and besides other modifications, Rolex altered the bpH (beats per hour) count from 36,000 to 28,800 (from 5 to 4 Hertz). Only about half of the parts of the original Zenith E.P. movt. were untouched after the modification (source: "Chronos", 4/2000). Rolex had been working on launching the new in-house movt. LONG before year 2000. Already on October 31th. 1995, a patent with drawings of parts of the movt. construction was applied for (Swiss patent number CH199 5000003077), and on October 29th. 1996, Rolex applied for further patents of the movt. (US patent number 5.793.708). (Source: "Chronos", 4/2000). Now to the Daytona 116520. CASE:: The Daytona movt. is held in an Oyster case with Triplock crown and two screw-down chronograph pushers. WR is 100 metres. The screw-down feature of the chronograph button acts as lock nuts to prevent unintentional activation under water. Here is a pic of the crown and pushers: The sapphire crystal stands rather high. A detail that I like since it makes the watch look more "old-fashioned": Some interesting details of the chrono pushers are that: 1) the pushers on the predecessor, the "Zenith" Daytona, were not placed at 90 degree angle, but slightly off-angle. But on the new Daytona, the pushers are placed at a perfect 90 degree angle compared to the case: 2) the "feel" and sound of the chronograph buttons being activated was in fact perfected by Rolex engineers by simulating the "right" sound and feel via computer aided design programs (source: Rolex website! Chronograph functions! (CLICK!) The case also has a fixed "tachymetre" scale (but does not say " tachymetre" but "Units per hour"): I will turn back to the bezel later under the "Legibility" section. BRACELET: The total of links on the new Daytona is 13 (5 on the six side and 8 on the zwelve side). The bracelet now has SOLID centre links, and the clasp has been improved by introducing a much more solid construction. The clasp has NO "Oyster" pattern as the predecessor Daytona bracelet had, but has an "Easy Link" hidden inside the clasp. The "Easy Link" can be engaged quickly to compensate for a swollen wrist in hot or damp environment: Clasp, polished centre part, no Oyster bracelet pattern: The Fliplock of the bracelet: The "Easy Link" disengaged (folded in): (note how elegantly it is made. You'd not think that there is an "Easy Link"!). The "Easy Link" engaged (folded out): (note the pin inside the "Easy Link" that can be moved to one of the three hidden holes to make further clasp adjustments). There is also a spring loaded pin just under the Fliplock. That pin makes sure that the Fliplock snaps into place perfectly: There is ONE disadvantage of the "Easy Link", though: When you never fold it out, the underside of the clasp scratches the polished centre link that leans against it: The inside of the clasp caries TWO types of Rolex logos: The "RM No. 644" Rolex S.A. (Sociedad Anómina) logo, and the "RM No. 21424" - "Swirled Rolex" logo: Besides that, the clasp says "Steel Inox" (steel 904L), E05 (date code for clasp. See more about those codes here! (CLICK!) , "Geneva Swiss Made" and lastly the bracelet ref. No. (78490). Here is an overview over the Rolex logos used by Rolex: DIAL: The arrangement of the subsidiary dials of the new Daytona has been changed mainly because of the construction of the new in-house movt. Cal. 4130. The new movement is of the socalled "Hunter" style (continously running second's hand at six o' clock) as compared to the "Lépine" style of the predecessor "Zenith" Daytona that has the continously running second's hand at 9 o' clock (source: this article! (CLICK!) So now the subsidiary dials for the chronograph (hours and minutes) are lying on the same axis. Furthermore, the subdials at 9 and 3 were moved up by 7 % compared to the "Zenith" Daytona dial arrangement: Further changes were bigger indices (hour markers) and - with the late F-series - also the socalled "Fat Hands" instead of "Skinny Hands" that were seen on the "Zenith" Daytona and the first examples of the Daytona with in-house movt. (see more about the difference here! (CLICK!) An interesting note: Chronographs being able to measure time with 1/10 accuracy will have a seconds trail with FIVE small lines between every whole second. The Zenith El Primero with its 36,000 bpH is the only automatic movement that has this chronograph accuracy. Since Rolex tuned the bpH down to 28,800, giving the chronograph an accuracy of 1/8 seconds, actually the seconds trail should have been changed to FOUR small lines between every whole second! But I guess most - even us WIS - can live with that "imperfection". The chronograph hand is standing EXACTLY at 12 o' clock when reset, very nice! (on the pic the minuterie of 5 can also be seen): The dial printing (font) is VERY crisp, and the subsidiary dials have a beautiful concentric pattern: MOVEMENT: The Cal. 4130 movement has a power reserve of 72 hours when the chronograph is not running and 66 hours when the chronograph is running continously. The "Zenith" Daytona had a power reserve of 54 / 47 hours respectively. Also, the new in-house movts. winds up 68 % faster (by wrist movement on its own) than the "Zenith" Daytona. The Cal. 4130 now has the Parachrom Blue hairspring that is impervious to the influence of magnetic fields and is also not affected by temperature changes. (read more about the PB hairspring here! (CLICK!)). PRECISION: The new in-house is considered to be among the ten BEST movts. EVER made (source: this article! (CLICK!), and the main contributor to the amazing precision of the new Daytona movts. is without doubt the Parachrom Bleu hairspring. My Daytona 116520 went 1 sec. slow, but I had it regulated, and now - 14 days after the regulation - it is still absolutely spot on! Here is a pic of the Cal. 4130 movt.: And with almost every part taken out: LEGIBILY: Due to the "Fat Hands" and larger hour markers, the new Daytona is VERY easy to tell the time from. Also, the more logical arrangement of the subsidiary dials of the chronograph is a big help when telling the time. Furthermore, the lume is very good (and lasts a whole night long when well "charged"): The BEZEL, however, is very shiny and makes the engraved numbers hard to see: There are further advantages of the new in-house Cal. 4130 movts. compared to the "Zenith" Daytona movt. To name a few: 1) Easier to service due to the construction where the chronograph area and the winding area are each under its own bridge. 2) Increased power reserve and better balance construction. 3) "Hacking" seconds feature (i.e. you can halt the second's hands by pulling out the winding crown to its last position to synchronise with another time source. You could not halt the continously running second's hand on the "Zenith" Daytona movt. 4) More solid construction of the clasp and bracelet. Now - after having typed all this - I need a Dry Martini Cocktail! Cheers, guys and gals!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
3 December 2007, 09:11 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
|
Superb review Bo
One of the best reviews of Daytona I've ever read Keep it up pal!!!Excellent work
__________________
Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX 116520 SS Daytona White Dial 116520 SS Daytona Black Dial 116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial 16600 Sea-Dweller 16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel 16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller |
3 December 2007, 09:19 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,181
|
|
3 December 2007, 09:40 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,634
|
Great review Bo. Man, it makes me love my SS Daytona even more :)
|
3 December 2007, 09:42 AM | #5 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Amazing review Bo. You did a great job. That's a lot of information and thanks for sharing with us
|
3 December 2007, 02:00 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,811
|
Bravo - Great Review!
Great Review. Many thanks for posting it here. Even Balls-ier taking the back off. Great Review - Setting a new standard for reviews! Technical but not too arduous.
-Sheldon
__________________
|
3 December 2007, 02:19 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Venice, Florida
Watch: 07 Air King
Posts: 125
|
Phenomenal write-up. This should be a "sticky".
|
3 December 2007, 03:36 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South East USA
Posts: 671
|
Outstanding pics, writeup, and technical review. It even ends with a wrist shot, and a fine beverage. Couldnt ask for anything more.
|
3 December 2007, 04:00 PM | #9 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Stupendous stuff, Bo. Sheer brilliance!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
3 December 2007, 04:01 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Outer-Limits
Posts: 21
|
Wow;
Now this is the reason to have a forum. Well written, excellent detail. Keep up the good work. |
3 December 2007, 05:13 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
The pictures of the movt. come from another source (www.oysterworld.com + pics from my Photobucket).
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
3 December 2007, 09:26 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Stefan
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc
Posts: 470
|
Excellent review Bo. !! Thanks alot !!
|
3 December 2007, 11:20 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Netherlands
Watch: Omega 2221.80
Posts: 61
|
Great review with lots of interesting details I didn't know about until now.
I do hope you'll write an equally good review for your upcoming GMT II-c Bo! |
3 December 2007, 11:22 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Nah, cannot get much better than Sheldonsmith's reviews:
"16710 vs 116710 GMT"! CLICK and "Two Rolex GMT's"! CLICK! But as far as I know a review of the Daytona was missing.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
3 December 2007, 11:37 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Netherlands
Watch: Omega 2221.80
Posts: 61
|
Those are excellent reviews indeed!
|
4 December 2007, 12:09 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Paul
Location: Lincolnshire UK
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 775
|
Thanks Bo
Excellent detailed review, stunning photos too. Cheers Paul |
4 December 2007, 03:40 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Spain
Posts: 12
|
Great Job, excelllent and complete review ;))
Best Regards |
4 December 2007, 04:26 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Thanks
Bo,
A nice treat for a new Cosmo owner in search of info. Appreciate the SIGNIFICANT effort you put forth to share your extensive knowledge of the subject. |
4 December 2007, 10:54 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
Yes, when you see this crowd using words like "excellent", "brilliant", "superb" and "phenomenal" you know you did a great job! Even the friendliest forum in the world reserves those complements for the truly deserving. This review is easy to read, detailed and extremely well laid-out with photos and supporting graphics to boot. I enjoyed it tremendously, you obviously took a lot of time and effort for the research and layout. What a pleasure to be on this forum with all of you. Now if you guys would just stop making me want a Daytona even more than I already do...
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
4 December 2007, 03:41 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 132
|
Hi Bo,
Thank you for the excellent review. Great pics and attention to details. Wonderful work. |
4 December 2007, 04:00 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 20
|
Beautiful Photos! Great review
|
4 December 2007, 05:47 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Thanks for all the kind words!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
4 December 2007, 08:37 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,937
|
That was a great review Bo!!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN |
4 December 2007, 10:37 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Darren
Location: Virginia, USA
Watch: GMT
Posts: 923
|
That is a great review Bo. Thanks for the thoroughness.
One question: In the section on the dial and, more specifically, the lines between second markers, you state that the old ones had 5 becaue of the 1/10 and the new, in-house one should have 4 due to it being 1/8 accurate. I see only 4 lines between the second markers in your closeup. Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't it be 4 for 1/10 and 3 for 1/8? Either way, again, great review and great pictures. |
4 December 2007, 11:32 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Yes, you are right about that. Just checked with a pic of a Zenith with an E.P. movt. (36,000 bpH), and is has 4 lines. I guess I need glasses!
So the Daytona should have 3 lines to be correct. DSCN0101.jpg
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
5 December 2007, 07:17 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
|
Truly OUTSTANDING Bo - very enjoyable even for a novice like me - thanks again, this forum is awesome thanks to the posts from people like yourself..
__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun |
5 December 2007, 08:54 PM | #27 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,262
|
Excellent review Bo 10/10
Learned a lot from that I didn't know Rolex had so so many logos for the clasp, it is really confusing. |
7 December 2007, 05:41 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
|
I'm sure that took time and thought! a genuine /valueable reference
steve
__________________
MEMBER NO.142 |
7 December 2007, 07:25 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 73
|
Excellent review
Enlightening review - thank you for sharing your well-researched thoughts!
|
7 December 2007, 09:23 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
Great review Bo. Makes me want to go out and buy another Daytona. Oh, wait a minute. I already did.
__________________
Ron |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.