The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 29 August 2015, 08:12 PM   #1
SUB14
"TRF" Member
 
SUB14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Danny
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 153
Rolex Milgauss, still "Milgauss"?

The Rolex Milgauss was introduced in 1956. That's almost 60 years ago, when Rolex started using the name Milgauss. So in 1956 this watch was already capable of withstanding magnetic fields of up to 1000 gauss (hence the name Millgauss). During the years technology has improved (like the blue parachrom hairspring). So did these improvements also affect the number of gauss it can withstand? I think it did, but does this mean it can withstand 2000 gauss, or even more?

In the original 1956 Milgauss (or pre-116400 reference, 1019), did they used conventional oscillator hairsprings, mostly relying on the magnetic shield the movement was in? Or did they already adjusted the movement itself, to create extra anti-magnetic features? And in what way was that movement different from traditional movements?

I can understand that for marketing purposes, it wouldn't be smart to change the name of the watch, to reflect the current magnetic field it can withstand. With the history of the original Milgauss, etc.
SUB14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2015, 02:13 AM   #2
fisherman79
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: The Netherlands
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB14 View Post
The Rolex Milgauss was introduced in 1956. That's almost 60 years ago, when Rolex started using the name Milgauss. So in 1956 this watch was already capable of withstanding magnetic fields of up to 1000 gauss (hence the name Millgauss). During the years technology has improved (like the blue parachrom hairspring). So did these improvements also affect the number of gauss it can withstand? I think it did, but does this mean it can withstand 2000 gauss, or even more?

In the original 1956 Milgauss (or pre-116400 reference, 1019), did they used conventional oscillator hairsprings, mostly relying on the magnetic shield the movement was in? Or did they already adjusted the movement itself, to create extra anti-magnetic features? And in what way was that movement different from traditional movements?

I can understand that for marketing purposes, it wouldn't be smart to change the name of the watch, to reflect the current magnetic field it can withstand. With the history of the original Milgauss, etc.
Its exactly 1000 gauss the case is 700 gauss and the hairspring 300 gauss.
If you really want an antimagnetic watch you should buy the an Omega with the 8400 caliber.
fisherman79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.