ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 October 2017, 06:30 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 134
|
5-vs-6 digit Bluesy
Hello Everyone,
I wanted to start off by saying I’ve decided on my first and only watch to be a 5 or 6 digit Bluesy, but am stuck as to which to get. The five-digit was the watch I saw as a child and was inspired by and have always wanted. The six-digit gives me all the updates and comforts I fell in love with when trying it on at an AD recently, but I’ve never been able to compare both models side by side. I’ve heard/read split reviews regarding the dials being either both the same or the 5-digit having a more iridescent hue... not sure which is correct. I’ve also had people advise me on getting the six digit so I have the full Rolex experience and have my name on the warranty card. I could buy new, haggle down about a 10% discount, and state this is my celebration of what I’ve achieved in life. ....but then the frugal nut in me thinks of how much more attainable the 5 digit is in price and that it’s THE watch I’ve always wanted. I wouldn’t have a warranty card, but at least I’d do a full service and I’d have that to state it’s truly mine. The more I research both models & owners’ stances on used vs new, the more lost I become. I almost want to just leave it up to the color of the dial, but I have yet to see both at the same time. If you were to get just one watch and celebrate a milestone, would it be a 5 digit or a 6 digit? |
6 October 2017, 06:43 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
|
I would get a year 2000 and up mint condition 5 digit and call it a day! Much prefer it over the 6 digit. The blue just seems richer, and I can't stand ceramic bezels any colour other than black. They just seem flat to me.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK |
6 October 2017, 06:45 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Julian
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Rolex 116613LB
Posts: 1,908
|
|
6 October 2017, 07:11 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
|
i Much prefer the six digit subs.
The ceramic bezel, shape, and wrist presence! |
6 October 2017, 07:13 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Scotland
Watch: 126660 D-Blue
Posts: 226
|
Owned them both, the first for 14+ years. I prefer the 6 digit, more comfortable, glidelock, maxi dial etc.
|
6 October 2017, 07:20 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
|
Not to my eyes. I know they have a high gloss; I mean the colour underneath. Doesn't seem as rich as on the aluminum bezels.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK |
6 October 2017, 07:29 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
5 digits more beautiful and elegant to me (these are the ones I always lusted after too). The packaging ends up forgotten in a drawer so personal significance of 'name on receipt' is probably going to be fleeting. Don't buy a watch for the adjustable clasp is my advice.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
6 October 2017, 07:30 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,381
|
I have a 6 digit, my dad has the 5. Both are great. I like the brightness of the blue on the 6 digits. Here's a thread i started of them side by side. I like the upgrades of the 6. If you check davidsw.com, he frequently gets NIB 6 digits in that will have you name on the warranty card. He has one now for $12,300. You also don't have to pay taxes.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=412186 Quote:
Last edited by WS9D; 6 October 2017 at 07:58 AM.. Reason: Price change |
|
6 October 2017, 07:42 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
The hollow gold centre links and thin stamped clasp with the 16613 is a deal breaker for myself. All of the upgraded components of the 6 digit 116613 make it a no brainer of a watch to own. Dial is easier to read with larger lume plots and hands and if you have middle aged eyes, you will definitely notice the difference.
|
6 October 2017, 07:50 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
|
@ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ{Adventure!)
Re: If you were to get just one watch and celebrate a milestone, would it be a 5 digit or a 6 digit? You mentioned that the 5 digit is the watch you always wanted. If that's the case, and you were to take a pass on the reference that really speaks to you, then I believe you're setting yourself up for long-term regret. Perhaps not, but I think there's a high degree of probability. At any rate, both earlier and later models certainly have their merits. Yet for me, the 16613 wears much more comfortably on my wrist, and the dial is a thing of beauty...it changes and "pops" depending upon the angle in which it's viewed. In comparison, the 6 digit dial is a bit flat and lifeless. Good luck with your decision and show us pics when you got em'! __________ Instagram: @onthedial |
6 October 2017, 08:32 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 75
|
I think this depends on size preference (6 digit wears much bigger) and how much you care about or need the glidelock. I picked up a 5 digit from an AD (2003 model) and love it. My name on a warranty card was not worth 4-5k and I was able to get a perfect fit without the newer clasp. You will love either model that's for sure! Good luck
|
6 October 2017, 08:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,650
|
It is up to you to decide, for me the six digit no question. I find the dial pops and changes just like my pals 5 digit, perhaps some here are thinking of the discontinued smurf dial? In any event a few pics of mine in different light. You cant lose either way, just get the one YOU want.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2 |
6 October 2017, 08:42 AM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,487
|
I prefer the rich dark royal blue hue of the 5 digit bezel. The later 6 digit bezels are closer, but they are still "off" in my opinion. Both are beautiful pieces.
|
6 October 2017, 08:42 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,246
|
6
|
6 October 2017, 09:17 AM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,380
|
Same here. The beze color matches the dial on the 5 digit. 6 digitnot so much. I'd pick the 16613
__________________
JJ |
6 October 2017, 09:19 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,796
|
^^x2. Handle both and you will see. The glidelock is the best clasp by any manufacturer.IMO.
__________________
|
6 October 2017, 10:38 AM | #17 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 16610M
Posts: 10,500
|
6
|
6 October 2017, 10:49 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Hands down 5
|
6 October 2017, 10:49 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
the bracelet and clasp alone make the 6 digit superior. hold both in your hands at the same time and youll know its true.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
6 October 2017, 11:27 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
Six digit for the Glidelock
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
6 October 2017, 12:49 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
6 digit for sure. Solid links, ceramic bezel, heft due to the full gold.
5 digit is still nice though. I just dont like the bracelet - it feels alot more flimsy, cheap, no micro adjuster. |
6 October 2017, 02:48 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 2,822
|
I prefer the 5 digit over the 6. The lugs are more tapered, and looks more proportionate IMO. The blue on the bezel is also a little deeper and rich. Below is a side by side picture. Hope this helps.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account. |
6 October 2017, 03:40 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 138
|
5 digit all the way... Here a 2001 unpolished
|
6 October 2017, 04:10 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
5-vs-6 digit Bluesy
Quote:
16613 is undoubtedly more comfortable and the radial blue dial is deeper. The newer watch has some upgrades but they're not better - just different. If comfort is important to you, 5 digits wins hands down. If you like thick and chunky then you might prefer the newer version, but the dial is not as nice as the older version Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 October 2017, 05:10 PM | #25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Rick
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
|
|
6 October 2017, 05:35 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 95
|
Just got the six digit myself, and never looked back. The shine is just perfect, and so is the beefier case, which I preferred over the smaller 5 digit. But, then again, the 5 digit was never on my radar though..
|
6 October 2017, 06:44 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,655
|
5-vs-6 digit Bluesy
I have owned a 16613LB since 2007. My only watch for 9 years, worn all the time. Beautiful, elegant and tough as a rock, even the bracelet. People talk about how flimsy and cheap the bracelet ‘feels’, but forget those bracelets stood the test of times for MANY years before the newer model arrived.
I have the six digit LV, and love the easy glide bracelet. But frankly I am not a fan of thicker lugs and bulkier case. All day comfort definitely takes a hit. To me, 5 digit is way more comfy for all day long wear than 6 digit and I would gladly give up the easy link for comfort in this case. Maxi dial and thicker hands of the new one make it more modern but take away elegance and make the dial too busy. What I love about the new one though is the date legibility ( white date wheel vs tan in 5 digit, and anti glare for the cyclops ). Considering all the history I have with my watch, I will not exchange my 5 digit today with a new one in an even exchange, I like it that much. Good luck with your decision. You can’t go wrong either way. Whichever you choose, you will be happy with. But if you always wanted a five digit, buy one since you can have it at cheaper prices. Then if you don’t like it, you can sell it at minimal loss to you and go after a newer model. Here are a couple of pictures of mine: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
6 October 2017, 08:54 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,726
|
The dials are the same between the 2 references, unless OP you are eyeing one of those 5 digit from the years that suffered from the purple pigment that eventually turned the dial to violet.
Try them both on and see which you like better. I'd personally go for the 6 digit, the new bracelet finally gives the watch a flawless quality. |
6 October 2017, 10:14 PM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Quote:
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
|
7 October 2017, 12:46 AM | #30 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 134
|
Thanks for all the insight everyone! Feels like it’s truly a split.
The 5 digit is THE icon with overall balance/fluidity and comfort in mind and the aluminum bezel definitely matches better. The 6 digit has greater legibility (or maxi dial & white date wheel with improved cyclops) & the solid gold links with glidelock add that substance/heft, but suffers from wearing a bit bigger on the wrist despite identical case sizes and the ceramic bezel is indeed of a flatter tone to those who’ve seen/admired its predecessor. I swear the way things are going I may end up with a 5 digit and risk my wife murdering me when I shoot for an LvC down the road... Quote:
The info about DSW is greatly appreciated. I didn’t know this was possible. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks! I’m glad TRF allowed it lol. |
|||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.