ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 April 2017, 02:27 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 27
|
I would hate to sell any of the three watches you mentioned. The new SD's are comparatively reasonable right now with the SS case bodies. They look great and costing less than half of the solid gold SD you can have your cake and eat it too. I"m not too impressed with a completely solid gold watch any more. Go for the movement not the glitter in my humble opinion. Good Luck!
|
15 April 2017, 02:49 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Watch: 16018-16610-116520
Posts: 180
|
What other watches do you have in your collection, maybe we can help more if we know!
getting rid of the Omega and Breitling is a great idea, but the BLNR and 116520 are too good to let go.... I'm not a big fan of the SkyD, but you are right you have to have Gold in your collection! |
15 April 2017, 09:57 PM | #33 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,270
|
Quote:
|
|
16 April 2017, 12:22 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
Need some sensible Input
I prefer variation in brand and style and I like both the Omega and breitling you've got, but if you don't wear them then I'd move them on. Personally I'd love that Omega you've got!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 April 2017, 12:36 AM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
Sky Dweller
It's a special watch! I have sundust dial! |
16 April 2017, 05:06 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: East Bay, CA
Watch: Sky-Dweller
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
I am also contemplating selling just my 116520 and Breitling Navitimer 01 and getting a 116515LN This way Id have a 116710blnr/116613lb/116610lv/116660/16520 zenith and lastly a precious metal 116515ln Seriously this thing is driving me crazy |
|
16 April 2017, 05:26 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
|
Always go for the most expensive one that sings to you.
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted |
16 April 2017, 08:18 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Nigel
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Watch: WG Sky Dweller
Posts: 98
|
Just consolidated my collection to get this.
__________________
♛Submariner Date 116610LN, ♛Polar Explorer II 216570, WG ♛Sky-Dweller 326939 |
16 April 2017, 08:23 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,503
|
|
4 June 2021, 10:15 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,228
|
From what you said, you should keep the GMT.
But then again, we wear watches for something other than function (unless you are a diver and are underwater and need data that your smartphone up in the boat cannot provide), so buy the watch that you love to wear |
4 June 2021, 10:19 PM | #41 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,571
|
Good advice, but Probably made the decision already. (2017)
|
4 June 2021, 10:21 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
|
4 June 2021, 10:57 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: GMT-07:00
Posts: 896
|
Need some sensible Input
They’re just watches. Don’t overthink it. Follow your heart.
(Only to realize I just got sucked into a 4 year old thread.) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.