The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 April 2024, 12:40 PM   #1
aboutime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
Amazing insights, thank you!!
I never knew about the rotation of the bezel having likely a smoother motion in one direction over another, and now understand the concept of the click spring, plus knowing that the operation of it shouldn’t be the determining factor and that it can be replaced easily helps.

The bezel on both models has the little ‘tail’ on the 2 (most obvious to my eye), and I believe those are the right fonts for the era. There is no history with either watch so I’m not certain if the bezels have been replaced or are the original item.

Another thing I’m curious about is the whether the bracelet springs should sit evenly between the lugs? Or if it doesn’t, is that a sign one lug has been polished more than the other. Again to my naked eye, both appear to be unpolished watches and pronounced edges (they look exactly like my 2004/5 explorer II which hasn’t been polished). The store person suggested that the bracelet springs do need to sit more on one side than the other giving an appearance that one lug might be thinner than the other.

The mention that the clasp code could be PJ1 vs P11 is a great call out. I’ll have to go back and check. My eyes are terrible and reading those details are freaking challenging! I’m bring a magnifying glass with me :)

My intent should I acquire this or any second hand Rolex is to bring immediately to RSC. Both sellers are bricks and mortar stores so I’m hoping there is some greater integrity when it comes to how they do business, though appreciate that is more wishful that reality. At least the google reviews seem to suggest their are reliable.
aboutime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2024, 02:58 PM   #2
luk4s83
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: US
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by aboutime View Post
Another thing I’m curious about is the whether the bracelet springs should sit evenly between the lugs? Or if it doesn’t, is that a sign one lug has been polished more than the other. Again to my naked eye, both appear to be unpolished watches and pronounced edges (they look exactly like my 2004/5 explorer II which hasn’t been polished). The store person suggested that the bracelet springs do need to sit more on one side than the other giving an appearance that one lug might be thinner than the other.
That's normal, the springbars can move a little bit left or right. You can literally do that with a toothpick. They shouldn't be sticking out from the holes though.
16710 is a fantastic reference and it's worth every penny. Get the best one you can afford. Ideally truly unpolished and at least with papers. You're gonna love it :)
If you want to learn more about 16710 check Watch Symposium Youtube channel.
luk4s83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.