ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 April 2024, 02:27 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: ROLEXROLEXRO
Location: ROLEXROLEXROLE
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 755
|
16610 full link
I understand 16610 full link in original companion has 13 links + 0.5 link.
Can shed some light whether 16610 in photo is considered as full link? Pardon me for not knowing how to count. Is the thin metal piece link there consider normal and comes in original state? Many thanks and have a good day
__________________
To each their own and your mileage may vary. "In the time of our life, live—so that in that wondrous time you shall not add to the misery and sorrow of the world, but shall smile to the infinite delight and mystery of it." — William Saroyan |
29 April 2024, 03:11 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,379
|
Watch in photo is fully linked. The thin metal piece is the divers extension and is in the open position. That is there so the watch can be worn over a wetsuit and comes on all 16610’s.
__________________
Instagram @dcash0615 2FA security active |
29 April 2024, 04:53 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 21,478
|
God ol divers extension
__________________
Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
29 April 2024, 06:47 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: CANADA
Watch: Got a Few :)
Posts: 549
|
Looks like you’re 2 links short here.
__________________
♛16570 Polar/♛16710/♛16610LN/♛116520 White Dial ♛16610LV/♛116710LN/♛126200/Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm (WHITE) “UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎 2FA Enabled |
29 April 2024, 11:05 AM | #5 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,090
|
Quote:
You show a 93250 bracelet which has an additional J-link to snap into the clasp, and the tiny half link attached to the clasp due to the slightly larger clasp size. This one looks correct. If the Sub Date came on a 93150 then it would have fewer links and no half link.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
29 April 2024, 09:12 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,512
|
Quote:
My understanding is.. 14060M 12 links (93150) 16610 12 links (93150/93250) 16613 12 links (93153/93253) 116610 13.5 links (97200) 116613 13 links (no half link) (97203) ..we don't count the diver links, only the removeable links up towards the endlinks (not counting the end links). When I bought a new 5 digit Sub, we removed 2 links to fit me. When I bought a 116610, we removed 3 links to fit me. Both were worn with 6/4 (6 at 12, 4 at 6) with the glidelock in taking up the 0.5 link slack. |
|
29 April 2024, 09:26 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,282
|
They’re very cheap to buy from the AD around 70 dollars don’t sweat it :)
|
1 May 2024, 02:32 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: ROLEXROLEXRO
Location: ROLEXROLEXROLE
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
__________________
To each their own and your mileage may vary. "In the time of our life, live—so that in that wondrous time you shall not add to the misery and sorrow of the world, but shall smile to the infinite delight and mystery of it." — William Saroyan |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.