ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which watch should I keep? | |||
124060 of course. It’s the best Submariner ever made | 124 | 34.16% | |
14060M - It is a future classic and will never go out of style | 154 | 42.42% | |
Keep both. Both have their advantages and a place in your collection | 85 | 23.42% | |
Voters: 363. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
8 April 2023, 09:32 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 402
|
Submariner - 14060M or 124060?
Hi guys,
I read and posted in this thread, which helped me a lot in my decision. https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=823630 I had previously a 114060 but never really liked the maxi case. On my wrist that watch just felt wrong so I sold it after a few years and bought a 14060M. Perfect watch for my wirst and have been wearing it with a couple of others for some years now. But I always lusted for a modern Rolex and when the Submariner 12xxxx came out I believed the corrected all the mistakes of the previous generation. So this week I finally bought one. But instead of trading I added it. My thoughts so far: Cons: - its huge - does not wear that comfortable on my wrist Pros: - the bezel rotation is a dream - I love the AR glass coating (inside only) - Glidelock is great - overall quality superb So, what should I do? Thanks! Last edited by Osmin; 8 April 2023 at 09:42 PM.. Reason: Try to insert picture |
8 April 2023, 09:33 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,997
|
Post a picture from about 3 feet away in a mirror of the two on your wrist please.
|
8 April 2023, 09:43 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 402
|
Thanks, added the pictures.
From those I would say I can wear both easily. |
8 April 2023, 10:07 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,162
|
From the pictures, both watches suit your wrist well.
I am now firmly in the 5-digit camp, but I had about a 3-year detour wearing mostly 6-digits, including the 114060 and 124060. I also have a thinner wrist than the OP. For me, I would find myself puked back to the 5-digits every few months. The fit on my wrist, the case shape, the lighter bracelets, and the overall aesthetics all won out for me. But, these are all personal considerations. It is hard to argue against the beauty of the black cerachrom on the 124060… You might consider putting the 14060M out of sight and out of mind for as long as you can endure - 1 month, 3 months, 6 months… you will know over time which one calls to you more, as the initial new watch excitement of the 124060 wears away. Time will tell if that’s the keeper or if you miss the 14060 too much. Also, as per TRF gospel, no harm in owning both! |
8 April 2023, 10:15 PM | #5 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,997
|
Quote:
|
|
8 April 2023, 10:17 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Cameron
Location: Canada
Watch: All of them
Posts: 694
|
It looks amazing. Well done!
|
8 April 2023, 10:22 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Watch: 124270
Posts: 821
|
I would keep both. There is no chance I would sell the 14060M - I kick myself once a day for not buying on in 2010 when they were trading for under $4k like new.
What I would do in your case is put the 124060 (or the 14060M your choice) on a Everest deployment rubber strap so you have (2) completely different looks. Another option would be to put the 14060M on a distressed leather strap (makes it look amazing) and you have 2 completely different looks with the watches. The 6 digit reference is much blingier and louder watch in my opinion and the 5 digit is pure class. One thing I have learned recently is that the Tudor Black Bay 58 wears very, very, very, very much like the 5 digit reference Sub. You might want to check one of them out. I love mine!
__________________
16234 "Y" SS Datejust 16570 "Z" Explorer 2 116610LN "R#" Submariner 124270 "R#" Explorer 1 79030B Black Bay 58 |
8 April 2023, 10:26 PM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,378
|
I love both. No wrong answer. I would choose the 124060 due the maxi dial and hands. Once you dial it in, it’s just as comfortable as any watch I’ve owned.
__________________
JJ |
8 April 2023, 10:32 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 402
|
Thanks for all your answers. Had a Tudor BB58 already.
Cannot say anything bad about the watch, but if you have both then I always chose the Sub. My grail watch is the YM40 Everose. So this will - hopefully one day - cover the rubber section. |
8 April 2023, 10:44 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Real Name: It's not Tim
Location: EST
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 1,106
|
|
8 April 2023, 10:45 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,031
|
After owning the 39 explorer (same issue), I noticed this…
For me, The modern lugs taper a bit more than its predecessor. Which is great. however the lugs turn down a bit steeply and result in a visually squared off look (they way the light hits when looking at the watch) that disguises that desired taper. For that reason my 14060 is not going anywhere.
__________________
|
8 April 2023, 11:09 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: tyo nyc fla ack
Watch: all the good ones
Posts: 998
|
Ditch the 12 series. Why keep something huge and uncomfortable?
I had one for a few weeks and could not get past the huge clasp, so I got rid of it. 5 digits you can’t go wrong. Good luck! |
8 April 2023, 11:15 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
Dial, hands, and bracelet point to the 12 for me!
|
8 April 2023, 11:32 PM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 45,023
|
I prefer the modern 6 digit Submariners. The glide lock is worth the price of admission alone. Keep both for now. Put the five digit up for a couple of months and just wear the 12. I would believe after a short time it would become perfect. In the end, you can own both but I doubt I would. Just give the 12 some time and wear and then decide.
|
8 April 2023, 11:42 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Guess
Posts: 324
|
I prefer the newer and more modern 124060 in many ways; especially the movement.
|
8 April 2023, 11:56 PM | #16 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,546
|
12* series without hesitation. 5 series Subs don’t do much for me.
|
8 April 2023, 11:57 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Real Name: Giuliano
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex - Panerai
Posts: 1,976
|
If possible, keep both. They are two watches that can coexist in a collection.
You say 124060 is huge, but it looks perfect on your wrist. |
9 April 2023, 12:00 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
Sample size of one, I've owned the following:
- 5513 - 14060M - 16610 - 114060 - 124060 - Pelagos - Pelagos 39 Decided through enjoying each reference what I truly liked. 5 digit Subs and the Pelagos 39. 124060 new from AD is the wisest financial play, 14060/M (two liner preferred) is the better Sub IMO. Lug holes for the win. |
9 April 2023, 01:50 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,492
|
That is my post that you linked … since then, I decided to keep my 14060M, based on all the positive comments to do so … but I still lust after the 12 Series … it’s just perfect in my eyes.
(I did by a 12 Series “Bluesy”, since the post, and sold to a friend my 11 Series “Bluesy”.) To me, the 12 actually looks to be a better fit on your wrist … not too big at all. I would see in 6-12 months if you’re just not wearing one them anymore / very often … and then consider trading the one that is being left out … if, you don’t want both. I know we’re “not supposed to care what other people think” … ;-) … but 99.9% of the people at the table at the restaurant, do Not know that you’re wearing a different watch. The 0.1% is fellow watch enthusiasts. |
9 April 2023, 02:01 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
I’ve unfortunately not owned one (did own a 16610), but I see the 14060M as the ultimate diver to own. Classic styling and lightweight, yet modern enough to not worry about abusing. Great watch.
|
9 April 2023, 02:16 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,031
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
9 April 2023, 03:12 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex SS Daytona
Posts: 2,624
|
Do you mean that the 124060 isn’t comfortable as compaired to the 14060M? If so, then it seems like it tilts the decision to the 5 digit reference.
|
9 April 2023, 03:35 AM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LA
Watch: what’s next.
Posts: 929
|
Keep both. They’re both great
|
9 April 2023, 03:43 AM | #24 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,467
|
Quote:
|
|
9 April 2023, 04:47 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
|
9 April 2023, 05:00 AM | #26 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,352
|
Keep the 14060M and trade the Sub 12 for a GMT II 12 on a comfortable jubilee!
|
9 April 2023, 05:13 AM | #27 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 5,897
|
Just simply based off of your pros and cons I would keep the 5 digit. If you feel the new one is too big and uncomfortable, why keep it?
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 116400GV | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV |
9 April 2023, 05:31 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 402
|
Thank you all for your comments and your votes.
I am already leaning to giving the 124060 away at some point. I really wanted to like it, you know? But somehow the spark isn’t there. But let’s see, I will wear it now for some time. |
9 April 2023, 05:36 AM | #29 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North East
Posts: 134
|
Submariner - 14060M or 124060?
Quote:
IMO you got it right. I just went through the exact same thing last month. I had both watches in hand and kept my 14060M 2-liner. In the end the 124060 didn't do that much for me. Just seemed too new and ceramic and glossy for me . If you think of your sub as a do it all tool watch and/or like it w/ straps it's the aluminum bezel 14060M all day. If you want a finer and dressier watch that "pops" then the 124060 makes more sense. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 April 2023, 05:44 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Mont Boron
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 192
|
I voted for keeping both, but then I saw that you find the 124060 uncomfortable.
I also have a 124060, and my experience was that it took a while and a few trips back to the dealer to get the bracelet dialed in just right. In my case it was really important that the clasp sits right in the middle of the wrist, and I actually had to go back to the store twice to find the "sweet spot", although I had never had such difficulties with having a watch adjusted before that. Now the 124060 is really comfortable, but like I said, it required some work. But whatever you end up doing, my advice would be not to sell the 14060M. I did, I will never stop regretting it... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.