ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

saxo3 · 3 May 2024, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tothemoon

Once there is enough, can you summarize the 2923 vs 2024 data?

Yes, but more timegrapher data is needed in this thread. There are not many members who do such measurements in a systematic and useful way (no criticism!).

Below is a very good example how to track a 32xx watch using a timegrapher. A Submariner 126610LV, caliber 3235, purchased in 05/2023, measured in 07/2023 and 01/2024. Watch and measurements from EasyE

This 3235 watch, only about 7 months old in 01/2024, obviously had too low amplitudes in all three vertical positions.
The movement issue was already visible directly after purchase! BUT ONLY WITH A TIMEGRAPHER.

View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok?
Yes, no issues	1,015	70.10%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine	61	4.21%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d)	372	25.69%
Voters: 1448. You may not vote on this poll

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)