The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex WatchTech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 October 2014, 12:48 AM   #1
NKflyer
"TRF" Member
 
NKflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog View Post
I presume that NKflyer is right, the bezel assembly design seems to be like the one in the newer Subs.
Yeah, I actually had my bezel pop off so I got to see the inner workings first hand. Had to send to RSC New York to have it repaired and this was well before Tudor came to the USA. They were like "what the heck is this thing" .
NKflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2014, 04:38 AM   #2
Blackdog
"TRF" Member
 
Blackdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by NKflyer View Post
Yeah, I actually had my bezel pop off so I got to see the inner workings first hand. Had to send to RSC New York to have it repaired and this was well before Tudor came to the USA. They were like "what the heck is this thing" .
OK, that confirms it then. Thanks for the info NKflyer.

In my opinion the TBB has two weak points as a serious diving instrument, that the older Tudor Sub did not have.

The new bezel design, if it is like the new Rolex ceramics, relies on glue to hold the insert in place. The older design of the aluminium bezel that snaps in place and is held put by elastic tension is pure genius. It’s been in use for 60 years, how many old Subs have you seen with a missing insert ? People tends to worry about cracking the new ceramic bezels, I would be more worried about them becoming unglued.

The function-less (hence unnecessary) cosmetic colour ring. Like I mentioned before, due to the crown/tube design, there is a very small gap between the aluminium colour collar and the crown when the last is screwed down. This creates a spot where sea water will accumulate and will be difficult to rinse after a dive. I had problems with said ring, it got corroded after just two diving holidays an was replaced under warranty. If I could have it my way I would loose the ring completely or replace it with a stainless steel one. But even this problem is just cosmetic. The crown and tube are still perfectly safe and functional even if the colour collar completely rots to dust.

So that’s still pretty good for a serious diver's watch. Others are doing much worse in my book (don’t even get me started on Omega’s He valve…)
Blackdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2014, 07:02 AM   #3
shofzr
"TRF" Member
 
shofzr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Dallas
Watch: 218235 BronzeWaves
Posts: 760
Tudor Heritage BlackBay and the Triplock crown

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog View Post
OK, that confirms it then. Thanks for the info NKflyer.



In my opinion the TBB has two weak points as a serious diving instrument, that the older Tudor Sub did not have.



The new bezel design, if it is like the new Rolex ceramics, relies on glue to hold the insert in place. The older design of the aluminium bezel that snaps in place and is held put by elastic tension is pure genius. It’s been in use for 60 years, how many old Subs have you seen with a missing insert ? People tends to worry about cracking the new ceramic bezels, I would be more worried about them becoming unglued.



The function-less (hence unnecessary) cosmetic colour ring. Like I mentioned before, due to the crown/tube design, there is a very small gap between the aluminium colour collar and the crown when the last is screwed down. This creates a spot where sea water will accumulate and will be difficult to rinse after a dive. I had problems with said ring, it got corroded after just two diving holidays an was replaced under warranty. If I could have it my way I would loose the ring completely or replace it with a stainless steel one. But even this problem is just cosmetic. The crown and tube are still perfectly safe and functional even if the colour collar completely rots to dust.



So that’s still pretty good for a serious diver's watch. Others are doing much worse in my book (don’t even get me started on Omega’s He valve…)

Glue is NOT used to hold the ceramic inserts in place, they are held in by friction.
__________________
Sea-Dweller 16600
Day-Date II 218235
Cellinum 5240/6
Speedmaster 125
shofzr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2014, 02:55 AM   #4
Blackdog
"TRF" Member
 
Blackdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by shofzr View Post
Glue is NOT used to hold the ceramic inserts in place, they are held in by friction.
That's indeed very good news. Thanks for the clarification.

Have you seen a diagram or pictures of the new bezel assemblies anywhere ?
Blackdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2014, 03:27 AM   #5
shofzr
"TRF" Member
 
shofzr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Dallas
Watch: 218235 BronzeWaves
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog View Post
That's indeed very good news. Thanks for the clarification.



Have you seen a diagram or pictures of the new bezel assemblies anywhere ?



Your welcome, 👍
Below is a link that shows an exploded view of the GMT Master II, and Submariner.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=283021


Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk
__________________
Sea-Dweller 16600
Day-Date II 218235
Cellinum 5240/6
Speedmaster 125
shofzr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.