The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 April 2020, 03:19 PM   #1
wadajr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Northeast
Posts: 11
Icon8 Is Rolex lying/exaggerating about the length of glidelock?

I just bought a SS Sub C (my first Rolex) yesterday, and while I’m loving the watch, I’ve noticed something inconsistent regarding glidelock. On their website, Rolex states that the “patented Rolex Glidelock clasp lets divers expand the band to about 20 mm in 2 mm increments.”

Anyone with a Sub C can take a look, and will realize that the glidelock system has 9 different increments it can be set to, with purportedly 2mm distance between each increment. If you do the math here, the total length that the glidelock mechanism spans is 18mm. However, because the bracelet needs to be set within one of these 9 glidelock increments to begin with (best case either the loosest or tightest increment), the bracelet can only move up to a maximum of 8 glidelock increments further either in our out. This means that the glidelock system gives at most a 16mm range of expansion or contraction, not the band expansion of “about” 20mm that Rolex claims.

Am I missing something here or has Rolex blatantly lied/exaggerated in their formal claims? I know Rolex lists the modern Daytona as being a 40mm watch even though it is well known to measure at 38.5mm; if this is also a lie it would appear that there is a concerning pattern of taking liberty with the truth.
wadajr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:27 PM   #2
mgsooner
"TRF" Member
 
mgsooner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 1,921
What an outrage.
__________________
|Rolex Submariner 114060|Rolex Datejust 126234 silver dial|
|Tudor Heritage Chrono 70330B|
|Grand Seiko SBGT021 day-date quartz|
mgsooner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:36 PM   #3
sgwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
sgwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
I smell a lawsuit coming


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
sgwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:44 PM   #4
Ihatecheese
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: London
Posts: 978
Perhaps pose your confusion to Rolex and see how they respond. Before that try having a bite to eat and some tea. It'll be ok, no need to get upset.
Ihatecheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:45 PM   #5
myporsche
"TRF" Member
 
myporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
You must be a real fun guy at parties.
myporsche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:47 PM   #6
whatsthetime?
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Posts: 1,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadajr View Post
Rolex states that the “patented Rolex Glidelock clasp lets divers expand the band to about 20 mm in 2 mm increments.”
I didn'tread where it states this? I did read where it states;

"Glidelock, allowing fine adjustments of the bracelet without using any tools - and allowing it to be worn and comfortably over a diving suit."
__________________
Submariner 124060
Datejust 16233
whatsthetime? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:53 PM   #7
drrd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: rd
Location: uk
Posts: 1,449
So are you sending it back for a refund?

Most people just use Glidelock as a convenient way to adjust the bracelet to wrist changes through the day.

Sounds like either you have a specific use for the watch and the combination of Fliplock and 'about 20mm' of Glidelock doesn't fulfill this requirement, or you're just being a bit pedantic.

Good first post though.
drrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 03:55 PM   #8
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,947
Class action??
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:00 PM   #9
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Unfortunately I don’t have my Sub anymore to check but when I did I took these macro’s of the Glidelock just because it’s a piece of engineering art imo.

This won’t help your beef with Rolex I know but just thought this thread needed a few pics! Lol

Just a thought, regardless of there only being 9 increments & only being able to use 8 etc - have you physically measured the difference in length between the fully closed & fully open clasp length?

Cheers











Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:10 PM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,598
I have to admit, I haven’t thought of this before. I‘m confident there must be an explanation.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:21 PM   #11
Greg 59
"TRF" Member
 
Greg 59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 876
Well spotted. I concur with your findings.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Greg 59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:24 PM   #12
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I‘m confident there must be an explanation.
Same way Rolex might have an explanation for Daytona(5-digit) and 16570 being 40mm and DJ41 being actually 41mm!
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:51 PM   #13
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,947
Looks like more than 2mm centre to centre.

I will check mine.

No, on my 114060 it’s only about 1.4mm/groove with a total adjustment of <14mm.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:58 PM   #14
cmcm3
"TRF" Member
 
cmcm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
Maybe they are referring to the Other type of Glidelock on the DeepSea? It’s strange they give the two types the same name. The DeepSea one is sooooo much sexier.
__________________
Platona with stickers off club.
cmcm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:59 PM   #15
cmcm3
"TRF" Member
 
cmcm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andad View Post
Looks like more than 2mm centre to centre.

I will check mine.
It only needs to be 2.5mm centre to centre to be 20mm total based on the OPs calcs
__________________
Platona with stickers off club.
cmcm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 04:59 PM   #16
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by drrd View Post
So are you sending it back for a refund?

Most people just use Glidelock as a convenient way to adjust the bracelet to wrist changes through the day.

Sounds like either you have a specific use for the watch and the combination of Fliplock and 'about 20mm' of Glidelock doesn't fulfill this requirement, or you're just being a bit pedantic.

Good first post though.
By fliplock, are you refering to the 5mm pull out extension on the clasp?

Just to be clear, theres no fliplock on a glidelock. Its either/or not both.

For example GMT/Datejust etc use fliplock, Submariner/Sea Dweller/Deepsea use glidelock.

__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:00 PM   #17
whatsthetime?
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Posts: 1,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcm3 View Post
The DeepSea one is sooooo much sexier.
Sexier???
The only thing I find sexy is a women.
__________________
Submariner 124060
Datejust 16233
whatsthetime? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:01 PM   #18
yoniman
"TRF" Member
 
yoniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesse
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 116234, 116613LB
Posts: 1,855
This calls for some serious beers. Lots of it.


It's just all about health, happiness & family. The rest are just necessary inconvenience we have to deal with.
yoniman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:06 PM   #19
Abmatt2002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK
Watch: 126300
Posts: 239
That it! I’m taking a hammer to mine this morning. Can’t believe we’ve been lied to.
Abmatt2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:18 PM   #20
cmcm3
"TRF" Member
 
cmcm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatsthetime? View Post
Sexier???
The only thing I find sexy is a women.


Sexy.
__________________
Platona with stickers off club.
cmcm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:25 PM   #21
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcm3 View Post


Sexy.

Sexier than some women - and better teeth!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:36 PM   #22
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,505
you have way too much time on your hands
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:42 PM   #23
swatty
2024 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,409
Thanks for letting us know, enjoy your new Sub
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:43 PM   #24
Greg 59
"TRF" Member
 
Greg 59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemanlee View Post
you have way too much time on your hands
Don't we all at the present time?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Greg 59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:43 PM   #25
DoDe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 628
Thank you for the fun-fact OP.

Please do not pay attention to members on a watchforum that does not want info about watches.
DoDe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:44 PM   #26
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,505
there are more productive ways to occupy one's time (but i guess everyone is different)
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 05:50 PM   #27
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemanlee View Post
there are more productive ways to occupy one's time (but i guess everyone is different)

Such as reading & replying to inane TRF threads....

Well I guess we are all guilty of that at the moment lol!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 06:07 PM   #28
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemanlee View Post
you have way too much time on your hands
Have to agree much more real important thinks in the world today to worry about.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 06:25 PM   #29
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 1,989
”about 20 mm”
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Untitlednew.jpg (263.7 KB, 645 views)
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2020, 06:30 PM   #30
drrd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: rd
Location: uk
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiss Mad! View Post
By fliplock, are you refering to the 5mm pull out extension on the clasp?

Just to be clear, theres no fliplock on a glidelock. Its either/or not both.

For example GMT/Datejust etc use fliplock, Submariner/Sea Dweller/Deepsea use glidelock.

Yeah Rolex terminology is a bit confusing.

The 5mm extension is Easylink.

Fliplock is the three section fold-out diver extension: "Fliplock extension links enable the band to be adjusted by an additional 26 mm" (Rolex website).

So steel Sub, Sea Dweller and Deepsea have Glidelock and Fliplock.

TT Sea Dweller has Glidelock but no Fliplock as it's too posh for actual diving.

The Deepsea system seems to be called Glidelock even though it's a more complicated system that allows adjustment without opening the clasp fully.

And yes GMT, YM, DJ, Daytona etc is Easylink.

I think.
drrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.