The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 April 2024, 09:56 AM   #1
Lord Tomato
"TRF" Member
 
Lord Tomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 121
GMT 16710 Serial Question

Hi,

I've been looking for a 16710 for a while, specifically with SEL and no lug holes (basically, the latest case variant that was released). I am in no means an expert when it comes to older Rolex watches, so I'd be very glad if you could assist me. I've found a nice and well priced piece (without papers) that is supposedly from 2002. I was previously informed that the first no lug hole and SEL 16710s were released later during 2003? The serial according to the serial number is Y855. Is everything as it should be? The store seems to be rather reputable, but I just want to double check with the experts here.

Thank you. :)
Lord Tomato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 09:59 AM   #2
PepsiBezel
2024 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,161
Late-Y serial models do not have lug holes (16710T).

Without papers, the serial number is just an estimate of production. The clasp code may be more accurate (though, obviously, a bracelet is produced separately from a watch, and may be mismatched over time).
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 10:23 AM   #3
Lord Tomato
"TRF" Member
 
Lord Tomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiBezel View Post
Late-Y serial models do not have lug holes (16710T).

Without papers, the serial number is just an estimate of production. The clasp code may be more accurate (though, obviously, a bracelet is produced separately from a watch, and may be mismatched over time).
Thanks! So everything seems to be in order? I guess all no hole 16710s have SEL? According to Bob's Watches' 16710 guide, the late Y serial was introduced in late 2003 though? Might the production year just be a small listing mistake from the seller?

Clasp code is: 78790A.
Lord Tomato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 10:34 AM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Tomato View Post
. . .

Clasp code is: 78790A.
This isn't the clasp code as we usually use the term. This is the bracelet style, a 78790 (Oyster, brushed with polished sides), with SEL (A)

The clasp code is 3 digits and can be used to fix an approximate date of manfacture.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 10:42 AM   #5
PepsiBezel
2024 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,161
IMG_4753.jpeg

In the photo, OP11 is the clasp code, indicating November 2006.

For a watch without papers, whether a seller says Y-serial is 2002 or 2003, or any year does not matter. It’s just an estimate.

This is a non-factor, sort of like your previous 16710 when all the paper work had LN but the bezel was a non-serif Coke.
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 10:45 AM   #6
watchnwine
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
This isn't the clasp code as we usually use the term.
The clasp code is 3 digits and can be used to fix an approximate date of manfacture.
The clasp code can be found on the inside of the clasp itself (I need a magnifier with my old eyes) and is likely to be one of the following in your example:

DE
DT
AD

followed by a number. The letter code is the year of production, (DE=2001, DT=2002 and AD=2003) and the number is the month. To put it together, a clasp code of AD7 would indicate that the bracelet was manufactured in July of 2003 and likely paired up with a case that didn't have holes. If the letters are anything else (or an S for service), the bracelet may have been manufactured later.
watchnwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 10:47 AM   #7
watchnwine
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiBezel View Post
Attachment 1432485

In the photo, OP11 is the clasp code, indicating November 2006.

For a watch without papers, whether a seller says Y-serial is 2002 or 2003, or any year does not matter. It’s just an estimate.

This is a non-factor, sort of like your previous 16710 when all the paper work had LN but the bezel was a non-serif Coke.
This is a great example of where to look - in real life, I find the letters/numbers hard to see!
watchnwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 11:09 AM   #8
Lord Tomato
"TRF" Member
 
Lord Tomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 121
Thank you all! I’ll ask for the clasp code! But just to summarize: this watch will also have SELs (no lug holes = always SEL)?
Lord Tomato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 11:54 AM   #9
PepsiBezel
2024 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Tomato View Post
Thank you all! I’ll ask for the clasp code! But just to summarize: this watch will also have SELs (no lug holes = always SEL)?
Yes
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2024, 02:56 PM   #10
aboutime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Australia
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiBezel View Post
Yes
I don’t believe the equation of no lug holes = SEL. I’ve been on the look out for the same reference and seen many SEL bracelets with lug holes in the case. I believe SEL was introduced a few years before the lug holes in cases were phased out.
aboutime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2024, 12:04 AM   #11
PepsiBezel
2024 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by aboutime View Post
I don’t believe the equation of no lug holes = SEL. I’ve been on the look out for the same reference and seen many SEL bracelets with lug holes in the case. I believe SEL was introduced a few years before the lug holes in cases were phased out.
16710T (No Lug Holes) = SELs (late Y, F, D, Z, and M serials)

16710 (Lug Holes) = Sometimes SELs (A, P, K, and sometimes Y serials)
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2024, 03:40 AM   #12
Lord Tomato
"TRF" Member
 
Lord Tomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiBezel View Post
Attachment 1432485

In the photo, OP11 is the clasp code, indicating November 2006.

For a watch without papers, whether a seller says Y-serial is 2002 or 2003, or any year does not matter. It’s just an estimate.

This is a non-factor, sort of like your previous 16710 when all the paper work had LN but the bezel was a non-serif Coke.
The clasp code is AD9. I googled and found a result here on the forum stating it should be from September 2003. Sounds about right?
Lord Tomato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2024, 04:18 AM   #13
watchnwine
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Tomato View Post
The clasp code is AD9. I googled and found a result here on the forum stating it should be from September 2003. Sounds about right?
Yes - and likely original with the watch.
watchnwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.