ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,009 | 70.26% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 61 | 4.25% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 366 | 25.49% | |
Voters: 1436. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Yesterday, 02:27 AM | #4861 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: USA
Posts: 8
|
|
Yesterday, 03:19 AM | #4862 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,521
|
Interesting pics.
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
Yesterday, 03:27 AM | #4863 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,811
|
This photo (or one very similar) has been published before and contributed to the lack of lubrication theory that has been bantered about these last few years. You can see a groove worn at the top of the pivot... (I believe that is the correct term for the portion that inserts into a jewell).
-Sheldon
__________________
|
Yesterday, 03:58 AM | #4864 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: North
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Yes there is a groove in the pivot (normal spot for wear) But the design of the axle is also changed, maybe just a production change or its for something. |
|
Yesterday, 04:11 AM | #4865 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: North
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
No recommendation just a discovery i made being curious and looking for wear on parts and also comparing old and new parts. There is information that the pallet bridge needs epilame because of migration of lubricant from dial side, interfering with the pallet fork, this information came a couple of years ago and was updated information for many calibers(3135, 2235 etc) and not exclusively for 32. |
|
Yesterday, 04:23 AM | #4866 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,688
|
Quote:
|
|
Yesterday, 10:39 AM | #4867 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 4,332
|
|
Yesterday, 12:42 PM | #4868 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,852
|
|
Yesterday, 07:43 PM | #4869 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,688
|
32xx movement problem poll and data thread
Not at all Dirt … without any more technical details. The poster also does not provide any background about his expertise.
Much more interesting, at least to me, are caliber data measured for 2023 and new 2024 watches with 32xx calibers. This was and still is the objective for this thread, to collect facts and "real data" - look back at post #1 in this thread. There are enough 32xx nonsense threads on the internet, including this site. All above of course is only my personal view. As soon as you reach 300 posts in this thread the management should consider to grant you the TRF Ig Nobel Prize. |
Yesterday, 08:42 PM | #4870 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: USA
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
|
Today, 12:15 AM | #4871 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,688
|
32xx movement problem poll and data thread
Quote:
Below is a very good example how to track a 32xx watch using a timegrapher. A Submariner 126610LV, caliber 3235, purchased in 05/2023, measured in 07/2023 and 01/2024. Watch and measurements from EasyE This 3235 watch, only about 7 months old in 01/2024, obviously had too low amplitudes in all three vertical positions. The movement issue was already visible directly after purchase! BUT ONLY WITH A TIMEGRAPHER. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 12 (0 members and 12 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.