ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 August 2012, 09:11 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: London
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 167
|
Plexi or Sapphire
Eyeing my 2nd model already and thinking of maybe going a bit older due to various factors.
The only thing that is putting me off is older models are plexi glass. I cant get a straight answer out of any shops so far I have had Plexi is stronger than Sapphire but will scratch more easily Plexi is safe to get wet/isn't safe to get wet Plexi is better than Sapphire because it can be replaced more easily Is what I am being told correct? Should there be any concern with getting a older model with Plexi glass? |
16 August 2012, 09:18 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 307
|
From what I understand plexi is stronger in that it can withstand impact without shattering unlike sapphire which is more prone to shattering if dropped on a tile floor. Plexi is also cheaper to replace if need be. Plexi does scratch easily but can be buffed out with polywatch or toothpaste. I have heard over time plexi will develop micro abrasions compromising water resistance. I think sapphire has been around long enough to proove it's worth and has become the industry standard. Most glasses that use plexi/hesalite like the moon watch do it just for historical purposes.
On another note this plexi vs sapphire argument is strikingly similar to the current aluminum vs ceramic bezel argument... I think out with the old in with the new will prevail. |
16 August 2012, 09:46 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
|
Quote:
History and tradition are two of the hallmarks of a great watch and if the watch comes with Plexi then so be it!
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent |
|
16 August 2012, 10:20 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Post the question in the vintage and the guys will have more feedback. As for me I have no problem with plexiglas
|
16 August 2012, 10:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Todd
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 104
|
If you want a vintage watch plexi is absolutely fine. My first Explorer II, I purchased NIB in 1982 was plexi and it was durable. Old cases cannot be retrofitted with sapphire and plexi is easily replaced. Go for it,if you want vintage.
|
16 August 2012, 10:48 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
1. Vintage Oyster cases had plexi, and Rolex oyster is synonymous for being water proof at various depths. Just think of the Sea-Dwellers used by the COMEX dive team
2. Plexi will get scratched easily but it can buffed by using polywatch 3. Sapphire is harder to get scratch but can get scratched. If it does, it can be buffed out by diamond paste (based on what I read on this forum) but you need some skill to do so. 4. Vintage models cannot take sapphire crystals and vice versa 5. Plexi is not a finger magnet, sapphire crystals are 6. Plexi on vintage Rolexes are higher, sapphire are more low profile Here's a thread that stumbled upon regarding plexi and sapphire WRT water resistance. https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=249295
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
16 August 2012, 12:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 211
|
Plexi is sexy
|
16 August 2012, 01:35 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
My Datejust has a Plexi crystal and, in all honesty, I love it! I think it gives it a very classic Rolex look.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
16 August 2012, 04:42 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,312
|
In some ways Acrylic crystals have a advantage over sapphire but its swings and roundabouts which is better.Myself like Acrylic very easy to polish a scratch out and all watches with acrylic crystals are changed as part of normal routine service.So as long as you have it serviced then there should not be any problems whether sapphire or acrylic.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
16 August 2012, 07:12 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: London
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 167
|
Thanks for the helpful replys :)
|
17 August 2012, 03:54 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ME
Watch: Vintages
Posts: 565
|
I have a couple of watches with sapphire crystals and I absolutely hate them because of the glare and reflections. Why they don't put an anti reflection coating on them is beyond me. On the positive side, the sapphire crystals impart a perfect look to the watch.
|
17 August 2012, 04:03 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
IMHO the vintage pieces look very classic with the acrylic crystal. I am glad Rolex moved to a sapphire Crystal with the newer models. I like them act they are thinner and to me appear clearer.
|
17 August 2012, 05:31 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
I personally do not like plexi, at least not on simple dials. The scratches show far too easily.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
17 August 2012, 05:49 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,798
|
I would not worry. Get the watch you like - if it's a vintage with acrylic then just have the crystal replaced - there is no inherent weakness in itself.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
17 August 2012, 05:52 AM | #15 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,798
|
Quote:
Aging eyes, ya know...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
17 August 2012, 05:55 AM | #16 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Ral P
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,384
|
Before I got my Big Block, I was looking for a newer Tudor 79260 because it has sapphire. After a few interesting posts from Dan P and a few others, I decided to go for the older 79160 with Plexi. I have to say, it is much better looking than I expected. I love the soft look of it and it is perfectly clear (for some reason I expected yellowing).
|
17 August 2012, 06:04 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,699
|
I have both vintage and modern - plexi and sapphire. They both do the job.
IMO, pick the watch/look you like with no concerns on performance either way. Plexi vs sapphire would be way down the list of deciding factors.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. |
17 August 2012, 06:06 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: SoCal
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Quote:
Get you you really want ! Good luck HAGOne |
|
17 August 2012, 06:11 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,625
|
Great responses above, just to add that plexi's are an automatic replacement with a RSC service
|
18 August 2012, 06:13 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: David
Location: Colorado
Watch: Bond 60th
Posts: 485
|
Plexi does pick up scratches very easily. My 5513 (1968) will get very fine scratches if I put it against the leg of my jeans when putting it on. Good news is as already said they polish out very easily, I use Maguires Scratch X 2 and a cotton wool swab, 20 second job. Personally for daily wear I prefer sapphire.
|
18 August 2012, 07:26 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
Acrylic crystals collect scratches instantly. They are easy to polish for the same reason they are so easy to scratch. In normal use, sapphire won't scratch at all, which is why everyone uses it now. I have a 24 year-old Datejust with the original sapphire crystal (the very first of the Datejusts to have it) and it has zero scratches despite heavy use. Even in blinding noontime sun, there are no visible scratches whatsoever. Contrast that with the brand-new acrylic crystal on a delicately-worn vintage Patek - several visible scuffs after less than a week of wearing. The difference in scratch-resistance is night and day. |
|
18 August 2012, 08:49 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Don't let the plexi alter your decision. There's always Polywatch if needed.
|
18 August 2012, 09:30 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
Is that why the 1680s have larger than normal date magnification?
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.