ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

archaeofreak · 13 June 2008, 01:19 PM

I cant remember ever seeing a face like that.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-President-...QQcmdZViewItem

RossInIllinois · 13 June 2008, 01:26 PM

It could be an after market dial. Back in the 80s they made all sorts of weird dials including stained and varnished wood.

Mars · 13 June 2008, 01:39 PM

Looks like - blue dial @

http://www.essentialwatches.com/list...7&itemID=14571

Black / onyx dial @

http://www.essentialwatches.com/list...8&itemID=12013

Maybe the bracelet / strap has been changed. His f/b looks like he deals in high end product. But I could be wrong.

krlyuzh · 13 June 2008, 01:57 PM

sweet Movado

tudorman8276 · 13 June 2008, 01:57 PM

....but, I own a 1803. My 1803 has a DISTINCT edge around the dial, as it is a snap on dial as opposed to having feet. The dial he shows does NOT have the edge. However, I do not know if the 1805 had a snap on dial.

Other than that, I would say that at least this is a redial, and maybe NOT the original mvm't. He does not say what the mvmt ref# is to be able to cross reference.

Stan.

stevemulholland3 · 13 June 2008, 03:56 PM

I agree that it is most definitely a redial.

2careless · 13 June 2008, 08:04 PM

plus the cyclops and the date display doesn't match/align. Also, mag looks too low.

jac67 · 13 June 2008, 08:45 PM

I have seen GOOD dials like that before, BUT that one.

You don't have to look too far with that one.

C'mon guys, look at the coronet it's crooked.

John.

tudorman8276 · 13 June 2008, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jac67

I have seen GOOD dials like that before, BUT that one.

You don't have to look too far with that one.

C'mon guys, look at the coronet it's crooked.

John.

Stan.

redshirt1957 · 14 June 2008, 12:02 AM

What would you expect with a watch that the bid price is 666.

stevemulholland3 · 14 June 2008, 08:27 AM

could it be......SATAN???

guydebordgame · 15 June 2008, 03:17 AM

i second the notion..."sweet movado"

AtlantaJim · 15 June 2008, 07:13 AM

why would seller risk 100% feedback and powerseller rating for fake/modified timepiece?

guydebordgame · 15 June 2008, 07:44 AM

maybe they dont know

1MAC · 15 June 2008, 01:23 PM

At worst, it's a fake. At best, it's a $h1tty redial. Either way, it's as ugly as homemade sin. Personally, I think the date magnification is wrong.

Terry Newton · 17 June 2008, 03:36 AM

It has been settled by having it removed. I think it was a faker.

Terry Newton

13 June 2008, 01:19 PM	#1
archaeofreak "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: AZ Watch: SS 16610 Posts: 125	Does this look real to you all? I cant remember ever seeing a face like that. http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-President-...QQcmdZViewItem __________________ 16610 with holes

13 June 2008, 01:57 PM	#5
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	He says 1805 case.... ....but, I own a 1803. My 1803 has a DISTINCT edge around the dial, as it is a snap on dial as opposed to having feet. The dial he shows does NOT have the edge. However, I do not know if the 1805 had a snap on dial. Other than that, I would say that at least this is a redial, and maybe NOT the original mvm't. He does not say what the mvmt ref# is to be able to cross reference. Stan.

17 June 2008, 03:36 AM	#16
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	It has been settled by having it removed. I think it was a faker. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

13 June 2008, 01:26 PM	#2
RossInIllinois Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Ross Location: Chicago Area Watch: GMT 2 Posts: 324	It could be an after market dial. Back in the 80s they made all sorts of weird dials including stained and varnished wood.

13 June 2008, 01:39 PM	#3
Mars Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 205	Looks like - blue dial @ http://www.essentialwatches.com/list...7&itemID=14571 Black / onyx dial @ http://www.essentialwatches.com/list...8&itemID=12013 Maybe the bracelet / strap has been changed. His f/b looks like he deals in high end product. But I could be wrong.

13 June 2008, 01:57 PM	#4
krlyuzh 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Kirill Location: USA Posts: 11,867	sweet Movado

13 June 2008, 03:56 PM	#6
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,673	I agree that it is most definitely a redial.

13 June 2008, 08:04 PM	#7
2careless "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Melbourne, AU Watch: Pepsi Posts: 4,370	plus the cyclops and the date display doesn't match/align. Also, mag looks too low.

13 June 2008, 08:45 PM	#8
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	I have seen GOOD dials like that before, BUT that one. You don't have to look too far with that one. C'mon guys, look at the coronet it's crooked. John.

14 June 2008, 12:02 AM	#10
redshirt1957 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Bubba Location: Bitsyville! Watch: Blue YM today! Posts: 10,053	What would you expect with a watch that the bid price is 666.

14 June 2008, 08:27 AM	#11
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,673	could it be......SATAN???

15 June 2008, 03:17 AM	#12
guydebordgame Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: ryder Location: nyc Watch: milgauss Posts: 80	i second the notion..."sweet movado"

15 June 2008, 07:13 AM	#13
AtlantaJim "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 10	why would seller risk 100% feedback and powerseller rating for fake/modified timepiece?

15 June 2008, 07:44 AM	#14
guydebordgame Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: ryder Location: nyc Watch: milgauss Posts: 80	maybe they dont know

15 June 2008, 01:23 PM	#15
1MAC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Leawood, Kansas Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 854	At worst, it's a fake. At best, it's a $h1tty redial. Either way, it's as ugly as homemade sin. Personally, I think the date magnification is wrong.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)