ROLEX SUBMARINER Model 116610 (2011 w/date) vs Model 14060M (2011 No date)

[Dan2010]

Originally Posted by Maxseven

The 14060 is too austere, has more feminine lines, a much thinner bezel assembly, and lacks the quintessential date and magnifier. The 116610 is vastly superior in every way considered, but therefore more expensive too.

Two completely different watches.

Nothing feminine about the 14060M.

[mailman]

Originally Posted by Dan2010

Nothing feminine about the 14060M.

I agree Dan

[Gerardus]

Originally Posted by mailman

I agree Dan

Own them both, honestly spoken; the No Date wears much more comfortable
But indeed, sometimes ....you miss the date function and need your cellphone

[Maxseven]

Originally Posted by Dan2010

Nothing feminine about the 14060M.

Agreed - not the watch, but some of the contours of the metallurgy are more 'curvy' than that of the 116610 (e.g. the lugs and the crown guard). So, when I say the lines are more feminine, that's what I am referring to, not the overall watch.