ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rick76 · 12 January 2009, 04:35 AM

Great review Larry. I know Omega has made some model changes to the speedy. I remember the crystal material was changes, but am unsure if many other significant changes were made. Can you shed any light on this topic? Thanks again.

hflee55 · 13 January 2009, 03:56 PM

Great review. Both classic watches.

azone5 · 27 September 2009, 03:30 AM

I'm learning a lot from you Larry! You're an excellent writer.

children · 27 September 2009, 05:32 AM

very nice review and stunning pics

oztimelord · 27 September 2009, 07:43 AM

Nice balanced review

as they should be.

Ultraman · 27 September 2009, 10:14 AM

Great review and comparison. Very stunning pics as well!

Well done, Larry!

PorscheStan · 3 November 2009, 11:09 AM

Great Review...Very informative, Thanks!

JohnEaton · 3 November 2009, 05:56 PM

Excellent Review Larry...

I hope you don't mind if I add a few comparison photos to your review...

I have two very hi-def comparison pics I can post but they are large, around 2000 X 3000, let me know if you want them here.

Kokyuryoku · 3 November 2009, 08:07 PM

That's a great review Larry.

Those are great pics John

I'd love to see the very hi-def pics.

1000ftSub · 4 November 2009, 12:05 PM

Gotta love both watches! Great side by side review!

JohnEaton · 7 November 2009, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kokyuryoku

That's a great review Larry.

Those are great pics John

I'd love to see the very hi-def pics.

Don't spank me to hard Mods, at least I asked first

And yes these are fairly large, I hope the detail makes up for the load time for those with slower connections.

Thanks for letting me share

ob1 · 7 November 2009, 08:00 PM

Wow

Thanks John !! Great photos mate.

keygold · 23 November 2009, 03:47 AM

thanks for sharing, both look gorgeous!

s.justinlee · 25 December 2009, 02:19 PM

great review on 2 beautiful watches

sea-dweller · 19 January 2010, 11:53 AM

Great review !!!

BXNupe · 11 February 2010, 12:59 PM

Great review and fabulous pictures, Larry. However, without factoring in cost, your review seems like it concludes with a "draw" thereby causing many folks to choose one over the other based on more subjective characteristics...namely, size, brand preference, historical import, feelings re manual wind...etc. But, if you include cost as a data point, is not the Speedmaster the winner by TKO as a result of it being approximately 3 times less expensive? Maybe I'm being naive, but it's hard for me not to hear the whispers of my practical side when thinking about which watch would be next on my list.

submariner16610 · 11 February 2010, 01:58 PM

nice review and picts. daytona is the best>>>

esm · 26 May 2010, 11:51 PM

nice review Larry and John for his Alaska/Daytona pix.

my 3570 is waiting for his chrono mate to arrive.... cant wait

Jim232118 · 27 May 2010, 01:54 AM

Great review, very informative

superdog · 26 May 2012, 09:29 AM

That was great!!

AJMarcus · 26 May 2012, 11:34 PM

The absolutely best comparison review I've ever come across! It is fair, accurate and has some great pics as well.

Hairdude1 · 5 July 2012, 03:08 AM

Great pics and reviews!

Mrpedigree · 6 July 2012, 01:25 AM

Yep great review ,but please let me give you something to think about if you was to be buying ether one of these great watches,in 1999 my kid brother got a new bi metal daytona for his 18th birthday ,my parents god love them at the time got a great deal for it and paid a £1000 less than the asking price of £5350 and got it for £4350 !
Just recently he was considering upgrading to an all gold model ,so he asked different places on what the watch was worth,ether for cash or as a PX ,one shop offered him £5700 cash or over £6500 as a px against a new gold one .
If they would of bought an omega for my brother would that watch hold its value as well as his rolex daytona has ??
Both great watches but for me there will always be the one sensible choice between a Rolex and any other brand .

NewportBeachWatches · 13 October 2012, 01:25 PM

Thanks for the comparison review. Learned much knowledge

GTS Dean · 14 October 2012, 02:04 AM

____________________________
TT OysterQuartz
SS/Black "U" Daytona
TT GMT II-C
DD OysterQuartz
Brietling Aero
Omega Speedmaster Pro

27 September 2009, 07:43 AM	#35
oztimelord "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Rene Location: Australia Watch: PN 6241 Daytona Posts: 468	Nice balanced review as they should be. __________________ Regards Rene PN 6241, 6239, 6263, 16520, 116509, 116520

3 November 2009, 05:56 PM	#38
JohnEaton "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Eaton Location: Washington, USA Watch: Red1680 metres 1st Posts: 1,860	Excellent Review Larry... I hope you don't mind if I add a few comparison photos to your review... I have two very hi-def comparison pics I can post but they are large, around 2000 X 3000, let me know if you want them here. __________________ Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment

3 November 2009, 08:07 PM	#39
Kokyuryoku "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Rye Location: Japan Watch: Sundial Posts: 2,177	That's a great review Larry. Those are great pics John I'd love to see the very hi-def pics. __________________ 'The Way of a Warrior is based on humanity, love, and sincerity; the heart of martial valor is true bravery, wisdom, love, and friendship. Emphasis on the physical aspects of warriorship is futile, for the power of the body is always limited'*- Morihei Ueshiba -* Omega 3570.50 (77mil) Rolex 16610 (V) Rolex 1601 (1966) Seiko BM

4 November 2009, 12:05 PM	#40
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Watch: Rolex,Hublot. Posts: 2,486	Gotta love both watches! Great side by side review! __________________ Check out my Hublot Watch blog! mikeshublotwatchblog.blogspot.com

7 November 2009, 08:00 PM	#42
ob1 2013 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Mark Location: canterbury Watch: new pussycat? Posts: 636	Wow Thanks John !! Great photos mate. __________________ "asteroids do not concern me admiral, i want that rolex, not excuses"

12 January 2009, 04:35 AM	#31
Rick76 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: NW Ohio Posts: 111	Great review Larry. I know Omega has made some model changes to the speedy. I remember the crystal material was changes, but am unsure if many other significant changes were made. Can you shed any light on this topic? Thanks again.

13 January 2009, 03:56 PM	#32
hflee55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Andy Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY Posts: 3,251	Great review. Both classic watches.

27 September 2009, 03:30 AM	#33
azone5 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: IL Posts: 406	I'm learning a lot from you Larry! You're an excellent writer.

27 September 2009, 05:32 AM	#34
children "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Jun Location: Brisbane Aust Watch: 16613- Bluesy Posts: 1,102	very nice review and stunning pics

27 September 2009, 10:14 AM	#36
Ultraman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Australia Posts: 2,147	Great review and comparison. Very stunning pics as well! Well done, Larry!

3 November 2009, 11:09 AM	#37
PorscheStan "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Stan Location: So California Watch: SS Daytona Black Posts: 148	Great Review...Very informative, Thanks!

23 November 2009, 03:47 AM	#43
keygold "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Surrey Posts: 22	thanks for sharing, both look gorgeous!

25 December 2009, 02:19 PM	#44
s.justinlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: california Posts: 282	great review on 2 beautiful watches

19 January 2010, 11:53 AM	#45
sea-dweller 2013 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: SF Bay Area, CA Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 16,381	Great review !!!

11 February 2010, 12:59 PM	#46
BXNupe "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Boston, MA - USA Watch: SS GMTc Posts: 189	Great review and fabulous pictures, Larry. However, without factoring in cost, your review seems like it concludes with a "draw" thereby causing many folks to choose one over the other based on more subjective characteristics...namely, size, brand preference, historical import, feelings re manual wind...etc. But, if you include cost as a data point, is not the Speedmaster the winner by TKO as a result of it being approximately 3 times less expensive? Maybe I'm being naive, but it's hard for me not to hear the whispers of my practical side when thinking about which watch would be next on my list.

11 February 2010, 01:58 PM	#47
submariner16610 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: united states Watch: submariner,daytona Posts: 698	nice review and picts. daytona is the best>>>

26 May 2010, 11:51 PM	#48
esm 2013 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,358	nice review Larry and John for his Alaska/Daytona pix. my 3570 is waiting for his chrono mate to arrive.... cant wait

27 May 2010, 01:54 AM	#49
Jim232118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Jim Location: DFW, TX Watch: Yachtmaster II YG Posts: 274	Great review, very informative

26 May 2012, 09:29 AM	#50
superdog 2013 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: me flip Posts: 2,664	That was great!! __________________ ___________________________________________ Take Risks: If you win, you will be happy. If you lose, you will be wise. Hard work beats talent, when talent doesn't work hard. The stars can't shine without darkness.

26 May 2012, 11:34 PM	#51
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: USA Watch: RolexRolexRolex Posts: 997	The absolutely best comparison review I've ever come across! It is fair, accurate and has some great pics as well.

5 July 2012, 03:08 AM	#52
Hairdude1 2013 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Chicago Watch: AP & Rolex Posts: 6,628	Great pics and reviews!

6 July 2012, 01:25 AM	#53
Mrpedigree "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: garry Location: UK Watch: Daytona Posts: 43	Yep great review ,but please let me give you something to think about if you was to be buying ether one of these great watches,in 1999 my kid brother got a new bi metal daytona for his 18th birthday ,my parents god love them at the time got a great deal for it and paid a £1000 less than the asking price of £5350 and got it for £4350 ! Just recently he was considering upgrading to an all gold model ,so he asked different places on what the watch was worth,ether for cash or as a PX ,one shop offered him £5700 cash or over £6500 as a px against a new gold one . If they would of bought an omega for my brother would that watch hold its value as well as his rolex daytona has ?? Both great watches but for me there will always be the one sensible choice between a Rolex and any other brand .

13 October 2012, 01:25 PM	#54
NewportBeachWatches 2013 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Nolan Location: Newport Beach, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 62	Great info Thanks for the comparison review. Learned much knowledge

14 October 2012, 02:04 AM	#55
GTS Dean "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: NB, TX Watch: 3570.50 Posts: 392	____________________________ TT OysterQuartz SS/Black "U" Daytona TT GMT II-C DD OysterQuartz Brietling Aero Omega Speedmaster Pro

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode