ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 January 2024, 12:40 PM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,901
|
Quote:
|
|
29 January 2024, 02:02 PM | #32 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,308
|
Quote:
Quote:
Force required to wind the mainspring is not applicable - what you mean is the energy/work on the mainspring that is needed to establish a sufficient “charge” is the same as on earth. Force is a linear quantity and a rotor winds via angular motion. In fact in zero gravity, you lose acceleration due to gravity on the center of mass of the rotor and thus there is NO force applied. Movement of the arm creates an angular velocity, which is carried as momentum via the rotor inertia. I am an engineer. Happy to discuss and theoretically assess these things but please let’s keep the discussion based on real mechanical principles so all those who read the thread in the future are not cluttered by argument that is not grounded in science. |
||
29 January 2024, 03:16 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boston
Posts: 558
|
It’s actually better if you ask me. U can wind it daily even if you don’t wear. Takes 30 seconds and keeps it running. Also, movement is sooo much nicer to look at versus a huge disc taking up the whole display. If you are new to watches it will strike you as odd. Once you have automatics and manual wind, you very well may end up preferring manual wind.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.