The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 July 2016, 09:42 PM   #421
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
Indeed.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 10:22 PM   #422
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by HorologyK View Post
Can't believe this thread is still open.
its like a bad penny...i am just waiting for someone to start posting the movement macro shots again!!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 10:26 PM   #423
belligero
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
^
Is somebody forcing you to read it? ;)

There are literally thousands of other threads here from which to choose, featuring such stimulating topics as:

"I am apparently incapable of using a search engine and/or making decisions on my own: Free advice required."
"I successfully managed to exchange money for things: Congratulate me!"

It seems that these two broad categories account for 90% of what passes for content on watch forums. I find the typically-resulting threads to be rather meaningless and vacuous, yet somehow I've never felt compelled to repeatedly mention that in one of them.

belligero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 10:27 PM   #424
josephashburnnn
"TRF" Member
 
josephashburnnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Watchaland
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by HorologyK View Post
Can't believe this thread is still open.
Because until now, no one can prove that any other brand(s) is more superior than Patek Philippe.
josephashburnnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 10:38 PM   #425
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by belligero View Post
^
Is somebody forcing you to read it? ;)

There are literally thousands of other threads here from which to choose, featuring such stimulating topics as:

"I am apparently incapable of using a search engine and/or making decisions on my own: Free advice required."
"I successfully managed to exchange money for things: Congratulate me!"

It seems that these two broad categories account for 90% of what passes for content on watch forums. I find the typically-resulting threads to be rather meaningless and vacuous, yet somehow I've never felt compelled to repeatedly mention that in one of them.

it wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't the same rehash of stuff that has come up hundreds of threads earlier...how many more times must i say ALS is like a hockey puck!!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 10:39 PM   #426
Daycruiser
"TRF" Member
 
Daycruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Ed
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: BLRO 5712
Posts: 787
Is there a brand that you think is superior to Patek Philippe?

Horology is more art than science, there could not and never will be a set of objective criteria to judge a brand's supposed superiority. Sure set techniques and mechanical technology are applied across the board, but the finishing, styling and flare of each brand must be given due consideration. These factors boil down to personal taste and is by nature subjective.

Patek certainly has heritage, which means 30 years down the line we can expect the brand to remain at the very top tier of haute horology. FP Journe is gorgeous, it's finishing a touch above Patek, in fact I would go to say a whole level above Patek. A Lange und Sohne is equally impressive, but their designs are even more conservative and their refusal to issue a sports watch when the market seem to be thirsty for them makes Lange too niche a brand to be compared to Patek.

Other independent makers appeal only to a small segment of the market, dedicated wealthy WIS, and as such is too niche of a market. It's like comparing a Pagani Zonda MD to the latest Lambo, one brand is relatively obscure whilst the other is highly recognisable by the majority of the population.

This thread will never conclude with a definitive answer, but who cares, the discussion here has been interesting and passionate, doesn't matter that we are going nowhere, it's the journey that counts.
Daycruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 11:46 PM   #427
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlS View Post
Sadly who am I to argue with Mr Dufour...he is the god father of independant watchmaking!!! He does think that the Seiko Credor is on par with AP which is a small consolation for PP fans....i think he may even have consulted to Seiko
A number of Credor watchmakers did indeed spend time with Philippe, learning how to hone the technique of mirror polishing beveled edges, with a bit of a stick.
Turned out, after a fair bit of searching, Japan had a native tree with similar properties to that which the Swiss use.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 11:54 PM   #428
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by belligero View Post
There are literally thousands of other threads here from which to choose, featuring such stimulating topics as:

"I am apparently incapable of using a search engine and/or making decisions on my own: Free advice required."
"I successfully managed to exchange money for things: Congratulate me!"

It seems that these two broad categories account for 90% of what passes for content on watch forums. I find the typically-resulting threads to be rather meaningless and vacuous, yet somehow I've never felt compelled to repeatedly mention that in one of them.
If we didn’t have the terminally lazy and the needy approvalists, the forums would be bereft of content!
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 12:21 AM   #429
belligero
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
If we didn’t have the terminally lazy and the needy approvalists, the forums would be bereft of content!
On the plus side, the signal-to-noise ratio would be vastly improved.

There's still insightful commentary and useful knowledge to be had on watch forums if you look hard enough, but it tends to get lost and drowned in a flood of low/no-information posting.

The advent of mobile devices that allow the pecking out of borderline-illiterate non-sequiturs on a tiny screen at any time probably hasn't helped the average-post-quality situation, either — though their quantity has certainly increased.

belligero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 12:41 AM   #430
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
Maybe you guys can stop criticizing Patek and talk about what's wrong with the forum for another 15 pages. What's Phillipe Dufours favorite forum?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 12:44 AM   #431
Daycruiser
"TRF" Member
 
Daycruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Ed
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: BLRO 5712
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by belligero View Post
On the plus side, the signal-to-noise ratio would be vastly improved.

There's still insightful commentary and useful knowledge to be had on watch forums if you look hard enough, but it tends to get lost and drowned in a flood of low/no-information posting.

The advent of mobile devices that allow the pecking out of borderline-illiterate non-sequiturs on a tiny screen at any time probably hasn't helped the average-post-quality situation, either — though their quantity has certainly increased.



Most the time we are simply patting each other on the back, justifying each other's purchase of exorbitantly priced pieces of horology. It's basically perpetuating a hopeless addition.

This is AA in reverse. But hey, at least we are hurting our wallet and not our body.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Daycruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 12:45 AM   #432
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by belligero View Post
On the plus side, the signal-to-noise ratio would be vastly improved.

There's still insightful commentary and useful knowledge to be had on watch forums if you look hard enough, but it tends to get lost and drowned in a flood of low/no-information posting.

The advent of mobile devices that allow the pecking out of borderline-illiterate non-sequiturs on a tiny screen at any time probably hasn't helped the average-post-quality situation, either — though their quantity has certainly increased.

I generally just use noise-cancelling earphones...
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 12:46 AM   #433
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
Maybe you guys can stop criticizing Patek and talk about what's wrong with the forum for another 15 pages. What's Phillipe Dufours favorite forum?


Very witty, Martin – so you recently got a SOH (sense of humour), and didn’t put up an “incoming” thread to announce its arrival?
Will this be a daily SOH, or a special occasions only one?
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 04:30 AM   #434
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post


Very witty, Martin – so you recently got a SOH (sense of humour), and didn’t put up an “incoming” thread to announce its arrival?
Will this be a daily SOH, or a special occasions only one?
Probably only special occasion (limited edition) otherwise I run the risk of overproduction.
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 04:55 AM   #435
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
^
Wise decision – use it in good health, etc, etc.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 07:07 AM   #436
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post


Very witty, Martin – so you recently got a SOH (sense of humour), and didn’t put up an “incoming” thread to announce its arrival?
Will this be a daily SOH, or a special occasions only one?
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 09:14 AM   #437
scrappy
"TRF" Member
 
scrappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 623
Is there a brand that you think is superior to Patek Philippe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by belligero View Post
^
Is somebody forcing you to read it? ;)

There are literally thousands of other threads here from which to choose, featuring such stimulating topics as:

"I am apparently incapable of using a search engine and/or making decisions on my own: Free advice required."
"I successfully managed to exchange money for things: Congratulate me!"

It seems that these two broad categories account for 90% of what passes for content on watch forums. I find the typically-resulting threads to be rather meaningless and vacuous, yet somehow I've never felt compelled to repeatedly mention that in one of them.



Truth. Although I do understand the enthusiasm that new watch owners feel and their urge to share.
scrappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 09:25 AM   #438
kunlun
"TRF" Member
 
kunlun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
I generally just use noise-cancelling earphones...
The Patek of earphones: https://nobleaudio.com/en/
kunlun is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 01:53 PM   #439
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
I generally just use noise-cancelling earphones...
Bose?
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 11:08 PM   #440
josephashburnnn
"TRF" Member
 
josephashburnnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Watchaland
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
What's Phillipe Dufours favorite forum?
And who is this Dufours fellow again? Some relative of rolex ceo?

josephashburnnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 12:38 AM   #441
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephashburnnn View Post
And who is this Dufours fellow again? Some relative of rolex ceo?

Only the best watchmaker in the world...

http://dufourwatches.free.fr/
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 12:49 AM   #442
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmc000 View Post
Only the best watchmaker in the world...

http://dufourwatches.free.fr/
The god father of horology and the independents with the finest movements in the world honed by producing exactly the same watch 200 times over a 10 year period! Never produced a chrono nor an automatic watch and can't do a 40 mm version of Simplicity as he would need to change the movement. So you are basically forced to buy a 34 or 37 mm (can never remember the production run) with a dial done by 3rd party and the plates! It's called Simplicity as it's simply boring!! For that privilege you do get the best polished movement known to horoligy with beautiful Devils horns but sometimes I have to wonder if there is more to a watch at over £140 000 and if we do t sometimes just buy our own hype! Shoot me down and no I have never held a Dufour nor will probably ever get the chance considering he has made 500 his whole life! Don't forget he wears a Datograph which he advertises at every opportunity!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:16 AM   #443
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
Maybe not a Simplicity but the Vingt-8 by Voutilainen is a time only platinum watch and it is bespoke, for approximately 80K USD you place your order and 16 weeks later the watch is done. That's about as long as it takes Patek to do a warranty repair! Is it better than a Patek? I'm not sure.
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:21 AM   #444
moonwolf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 25
Superior is a hard to define term to me..

I think Lange has more visually pleasing finishes and Rolex has better quality movements (technically). And, to me Dufour is THE GRAIL.

Yet, I think Patek still is the most prestigious brand in general terms of things.
moonwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:26 AM   #445
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlS View Post
The god father of horology and the independents with the finest movements in the world honed by producing exactly the same watch 200 times over a 10 year period! Never produced a chrono nor an automatic watch and can't do a 40 mm version of Simplicity as he would need to change the movement. So you are basically forced to buy a 34 or 37 mm (can never remember the production run) with a dial done by 3rd party and the plates! It's called Simplicity as it's simply boring!! For that privilege you do get the best polished movement known to horoligy with beautiful Devils horns but sometimes I have to wonder if there is more to a watch at over £140 000 and if we do t sometimes just buy our own hype! Shoot me down and no I have never held a Dufour nor will probably ever get the chance considering he has made 500 his whole life! Don't forget he wears a Datograph which he advertises at every opportunity!
Did you miss that Dufour was the first man EVER to make a grand-strike wristwatch? The first wristwatch that chimes the passing hours and quarters, in 1992.

C'mon guys, let's just be serious. I understand that the Datograph thing is given more importance that it probably has but limiting Dufour to just what you wrote is simply ridicolous.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:26 AM   #446
josephashburnnn
"TRF" Member
 
josephashburnnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Watchaland
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
Maybe not a Simplicity but the Vingt-8 by Voutlainen is a time only platinum watch and it is bespoke, for approximately 80K USD you place your order and 16 weeks later the watch is done. That's about as long as it takes Patek to do a warranty repair! Is it better than a Patek? I'm not sure.
Holy sh*t! 80K for a time only watch? It must have come with a lifetime concierge service!
josephashburnnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:48 AM   #447
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
Maybe not a Simplicity but the Vingt-8 by Voutlainen is a time only platinum watch and it is bespoke, for approximately 80K USD you place your order and 16 weeks later the watch is done. That's about as long as it takes Patek to do a warranty repair! Is it better than a Patek? I'm not sure.
Certainly a more interesting dial and the same hands!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 01:52 AM   #448
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmc000 View Post
Did you miss that Dufour was the first man EVER to make a grand-strike wristwatch? The first wristwatch that chimes the passing hours and quarters, in 1992.

C'mon guys, let's just be serious. I understand that the Datograph thing is given more importance that it probably has but limiting Dufour to just what you wrote is simply ridicolous.
Oh grief i apologies...please ignore everything I wrote!! He did something great 28 years ago and then produced a succession of very boring but finely executed time only watches! But he has recently done something with Greubel Forsey and Seiko!!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 02:30 AM   #449
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
A few days ago I was at a watch dealer and he has Greubel Forsey. He showed me a 500K example, said he'd sold four to the same guy in the last six months, it was huge, weighed a ton, and wasn't exactly attractive, not something I'd want to wear at any price. It may be a watchmaking tour de force etc. have fantastic finishing and all that but I like my Patek 5905P more. So what's better?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 02:32 AM   #450
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
A few days ago I was at a watch dealer and he has Greubel Forsey. He showed me a 500K example, said he'd sold four to the same guy in the last six months, it was huge, weighed a ton, and wasn't exactly attractive, not something I'd want to wear at any price. It may be a watchmaking tour de force etc. have fantastic finishing and all that but I like my Patek 5905P more. So what's better?
Spot on!! I tried on 2 in Dubai and they did nothing for me, but like RM but sometimes we buy into the ideal! The emperor and his clothes sometimes!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.