ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 April 2014, 06:47 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
|
Comparson of 2 GMTs
Hi Guys, Once again, this is part advice part education, and as always thanks in advance. I would like to get a Pepsi GMT. I have been looking at a ton. I have my eye on one I posted about earlier from ebay, but the price continues to rise. I missed out on a couple in here that I thought were great. Of the current crop I found these 2. I would love your opinions on which and why or why not.
This one - I like the age, tiny marker, but the provenance is unknown. It is clean, but not suspiciously clean (??) http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...+Mini-GMT+Hand This one is more $$ but has all the papers etc. Seems pricey, actually both are out of my range abit, but would rather maybe spend a little more to buy smarter. http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...Collectors+Set Or should I continue to try and find something matte dial mid/late 60's for $4k-$5k ??
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013 Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967 Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007 Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985 Sold but wish I didn't Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972 |
2 April 2014, 06:54 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
|
Both are nice but the second one (greekbums) is outstanding. Well worth the small added premium.
|
2 April 2014, 07:00 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
|
Really? The pitting on the bezel doesn't bother you? The paperwork is that important? or are there intangibles I am missing ?
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013 Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967 Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007 Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985 Sold but wish I didn't Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972 |
2 April 2014, 07:06 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
Quote:
This is the 3rd non gilt gmt with the small 24hr hand ive seen lately. I remember Springer saying that during the transition some of the Matte dial Gmts ended up with the small 24 hr hand. Cool to see different variations. I personally would just pay the premium for greekbums. His is very nice and fairly priced imo for something with box and papers. Its a much better looking watch as well. just my 2cents Edit. The pitting your talking about is not a problem at all. Easily replaced with a new insert. |
|
2 April 2014, 07:10 AM | #5 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013 Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967 Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007 Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985 Sold but wish I didn't Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972 |
|
2 April 2014, 07:11 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
|
Quote:
I'm attracted to the second one for: The case Originality Recent service And THE CASE! IMHO it's a very nice GMT. |
|
2 April 2014, 07:16 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
Quote:
|
|
2 April 2014, 07:18 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Tokyo
Watch: GMT 16710, 1675
Posts: 294
|
I think 4k - 5k price range is going to be hard to find a nice MK1 matte dial 1675. Papers and all the swag is always nice to have but not a deal breaker for me. You can find a nice late 60's 1675 for 5k - 6k range. I personally don't like either of the two you posted.The small 24 hour pointer looks off to me but I could be wrong the other 1970 looks like the 12 o'clock lume was damaged and repaired for $7300 I think you could find a much better ser. 2xx mil 1675.
|
2 April 2014, 07:20 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
edit
|
2 April 2014, 07:23 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
Quote:
I like the idea of having papers but i agree its no deal breaker. I prefer to have a nice example. I have papers for my snowflake but they rarely leave the safe. |
|
2 April 2014, 07:36 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,401
|
id pass on both, tbh. the bezel on the 2nd is nice, faded colors but the pitting would bother me and finding a new insert that is faded nicely will get really expensive and be a long search.
|
2 April 2014, 10:02 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,239
|
Complete sets are nice to have and are more pricey than those without. While not a complete set, the important items are there.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
2 April 2014, 10:08 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,239
|
Nice, period correct inserts, that are not scratched, pitted etc, are getting hard to find and fetch $750 on up. Nice 1675 GMT-Masters have appreciated well the past couple of years. $6000 on up seems to be where the nice ones are at this time.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
2 April 2014, 11:28 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
The pitting isnt a big deal like everyone said, you can easily replace it should you wish so. I personally would leave it just like that.
The box and papers for a small 24-hour hands, to me, is a huge plus. Since it's a rarity amongst the more common larger 24-hour hands. If it was a "common" 24-hour hand, I would opt for the nonpaper one. Since the collectability value is personally different to me.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
2 April 2014, 12:43 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
Quote:
The gmt with papers has the bigger 24 hr hand. |
|
2 April 2014, 11:24 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 1,107
|
Greekbum also has a nice 16750 set if you're interested: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=343664
|
2 April 2014, 11:56 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,297
|
I prefer the second one, and not bothered about the insert. Needs a new crystal, though.
|
3 April 2014, 12:39 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,661
|
update
As an owner & collector of GMT's for 30 year plus I'd suggest some more research if you think an insert is a deal breaker on a nice watch :-) No critique on the ones for sale but pay attention to the case quality as well as the dial and hands. Make sure the components are date specific to the watch in question if at all possible. After that many years if the watch has been worn you can expect insert, replacement bezels, dials hands, bracelets & movement parts to have been replaced under service etc. If you expect a non touched museum example be prepared to pay for it and for the dealer to back up his watch as well. good luck with your search. m
Last edited by watchcrank; 3 April 2014 at 12:41 AM.. Reason: additional text |
5 April 2014, 11:34 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
|
Update. After almost going for one of these I waited. Found what I think (hope) is a nice example. Early matte dial 16750
. Arrives next week.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013 Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967 Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007 Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985 Sold but wish I didn't Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972 |
6 April 2014, 05:14 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
|
6 April 2014, 02:06 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
|
Good choice IMO
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.