The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 April 2014, 06:47 AM   #1
seabreeze
2024 Pledge Member
 
seabreeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
Comparson of 2 GMTs

Hi Guys, Once again, this is part advice part education, and as always thanks in advance. I would like to get a Pepsi GMT. I have been looking at a ton. I have my eye on one I posted about earlier from ebay, but the price continues to rise. I missed out on a couple in here that I thought were great. Of the current crop I found these 2. I would love your opinions on which and why or why not.

This one - I like the age, tiny marker, but the provenance is unknown. It is clean, but not suspiciously clean (??)
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...+Mini-GMT+Hand

This one is more $$ but has all the papers etc. Seems pricey, actually both are out of my range abit, but would rather maybe spend a little more to buy smarter.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...Collectors+Set


Or should I continue to try and find something matte dial mid/late 60's for $4k-$5k ??
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013
Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967
Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007
Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985
Sold but wish I didn't
Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972
seabreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 06:54 AM   #2
nsumner
"TRF" Member
 
nsumner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
Both are nice but the second one (greekbums) is outstanding. Well worth the small added premium.
nsumner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:00 AM   #3
seabreeze
2024 Pledge Member
 
seabreeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by nsumner View Post
Both are nice but the second one (greekbums) is outstanding. Well worth the small added premium.
Really? The pitting on the bezel doesn't bother you? The paperwork is that important? or are there intangibles I am missing ?
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013
Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967
Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007
Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985
Sold but wish I didn't
Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972
seabreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:06 AM   #4
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze View Post
Hi Guys, Once again, this is part advice part education, and as always thanks in advance. I would like to get a Pepsi GMT. I have been looking at a ton. I have my eye on one I posted about earlier from ebay, but the price continues to rise. I missed out on a couple in here that I thought were great. Of the current crop I found these 2. I would love your opinions on which and why or why not.

This one - I like the age, tiny marker, but the provenance is unknown. It is clean, but not suspiciously clean (??)
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...+Mini-GMT+Hand

This one is more $$ but has all the papers etc. Seems pricey, actually both are out of my range abit, but would rather maybe spend a little more to buy smarter.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...Collectors+Set


Or should I continue to try and find something matte dial mid/late 60's for $4k-$5k ??






This is the 3rd non gilt gmt with the small 24hr hand ive seen lately. I remember Springer saying that during the transition some of the Matte dial Gmts ended up with the small 24 hr hand. Cool to see different variations.

I personally would just pay the premium for greekbums. His is very nice and fairly priced imo for something with box and papers. Its a much better looking watch as well. just my 2cents


Edit. The pitting your talking about is not a problem at all. Easily replaced with a new insert.
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:10 AM   #5
seabreeze
2024 Pledge Member
 
seabreeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownMe View Post
This is the 3rd non gilt gmt with the small 24hr hand ive seen lately. I remember Springer saying that during the transition some of the Matte dial Gmts ended up with the small 24 hr hand. Cool to see different variations.

I personally would just pay the premium for greekbums. His is very nice and fairly priced imo for something with box and papers. Its a much better looking watch as well. just my 2cents


Edit. The pitting your talking about is not a problem at all. Nothing compared to many vintage watches on this forum.
Yes I think you mentioned that when I posted one on here I saw on eBay. I have still not gotten a response as to why the dial on that is not original....although I can surmise the reason - that the dial probably got sold and fetched as much as the watch. maybe?
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013
Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967
Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007
Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985
Sold but wish I didn't
Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972
seabreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:11 AM   #6
nsumner
"TRF" Member
 
nsumner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze View Post
Really? The pitting on the bezel doesn't bother you? The paperwork is that important? or are there intangibles I am missing ?
The pitting of the insert isn't a big deal. It can be changed and I'm sure if you ask nicely the seller will try and come up with one for you (I'm sure he has a few).

I'm attracted to the second one for:
The case
Originality
Recent service
And THE CASE!

IMHO it's a very nice GMT.
nsumner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:16 AM   #7
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by nsumner View Post
The pitting of the insert isn't a big deal. It can be changed and I'm sure if you ask nicely the seller will try and come up with one for you (I'm sure he has a few).

I'm attracted to the second one for:
The case
Originality
Recent service
And THE CASE!

IMHO it's a very nice GMT.
Its a great case. Love the chamfer edges. i dont think its unpolished by the top lug picture but very still very thick. Cool that it comes with punched papers.
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:18 AM   #8
silversurfer96790
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Tokyo
Watch: GMT 16710, 1675
Posts: 294
I think 4k - 5k price range is going to be hard to find a nice MK1 matte dial 1675. Papers and all the swag is always nice to have but not a deal breaker for me. You can find a nice late 60's 1675 for 5k - 6k range. I personally don't like either of the two you posted.The small 24 hour pointer looks off to me but I could be wrong the other 1970 looks like the 12 o'clock lume was damaged and repaired for $7300 I think you could find a much better ser. 2xx mil 1675.
silversurfer96790 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:20 AM   #9
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
edit
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:23 AM   #10
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by silversurfer96790 View Post
I think 4k - 5k price range is going to be hard to find a nice MK1 matte dial 1675. Papers and all the swag is always nice to have but not a deal breaker for me. You can find a nice late 60's 1675 for 5k - 6k range. I personally don't like either of the two you posted.The small 24 hour pointer looks off to me but I could be wrong the other 1970 looks like the 12 o'clock lume was damaged and repaired for $7300 I think you could find a much better ser. 2xx mil 1675.


I like the idea of having papers but i agree its no deal breaker. I prefer to have a nice example. I have papers for my snowflake but they rarely leave the safe.
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 07:36 AM   #11
jfmiii
"TRF" Member
 
jfmiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,401
id pass on both, tbh. the bezel on the 2nd is nice, faded colors but the pitting would bother me and finding a new insert that is faded nicely will get really expensive and be a long search.
jfmiii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 10:02 AM   #12
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze View Post
Really? The pitting on the bezel doesn't bother you? The paperwork is that important? or are there intangibles I am missing ?
Complete sets are nice to have and are more pricey than those without. While not a complete set, the important items are there.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 10:08 AM   #13
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfmiii View Post
id pass on both, tbh. the bezel on the 2nd is nice, faded colors but the pitting would bother me and finding a new insert that is faded nicely will get really expensive and be a long search.
Nice, period correct inserts, that are not scratched, pitted etc, are getting hard to find and fetch $750 on up. Nice 1675 GMT-Masters have appreciated well the past couple of years. $6000 on up seems to be where the nice ones are at this time.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 11:28 AM   #14
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
The pitting isnt a big deal like everyone said, you can easily replace it should you wish so. I personally would leave it just like that.

The box and papers for a small 24-hour hands, to me, is a huge plus. Since it's a rarity amongst the more common larger 24-hour hands.

If it was a "common" 24-hour hand, I would opt for the nonpaper one. Since the collectability value is personally different to me.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 12:43 PM   #15
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shade View Post
The pitting isnt a big deal like everyone said, you can easily replace it should you wish so. I personally would leave it just like that.

The box and papers for a small 24-hour hands, to me, is a huge plus. Since it's a rarity amongst the more common larger 24-hour hands.

If it was a "common" 24-hour hand, I would opt for the nonpaper one. Since the collectability value is personally different to me.


The gmt with papers has the bigger 24 hr hand.
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 11:24 PM   #16
nycpassat
"TRF" Member
 
nycpassat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 1,107
Greekbum also has a nice 16750 set if you're interested: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=343664
nycpassat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2014, 11:56 PM   #17
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,297
I prefer the second one, and not bothered about the insert. Needs a new crystal, though.
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2014, 12:39 AM   #18
watchcrank
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,661
update

As an owner & collector of GMT's for 30 year plus I'd suggest some more research if you think an insert is a deal breaker on a nice watch :-) No critique on the ones for sale but pay attention to the case quality as well as the dial and hands. Make sure the components are date specific to the watch in question if at all possible. After that many years if the watch has been worn you can expect insert, replacement bezels, dials hands, bracelets & movement parts to have been replaced under service etc. If you expect a non touched museum example be prepared to pay for it and for the dealer to back up his watch as well. good luck with your search. m

Last edited by watchcrank; 3 April 2014 at 12:41 AM.. Reason: additional text
watchcrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 11:34 PM   #19
seabreeze
2024 Pledge Member
 
seabreeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 832
Update. After almost going for one of these I waited. Found what I think (hope) is a nice example. Early matte dial 16750

. Arrives next week.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013
Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967
Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007
Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985
Sold but wish I didn't
Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972
seabreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2014, 05:14 AM   #20
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze View Post
Update. After almost going for one of these I waited. Found what I think (hope) is a nice example. Early matte dial 16750

. Arrives next week.


You made the right decision. John is a class act and I'm sure the watch Will be even nicer then you expect. congrats
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 April 2014, 02:06 PM   #21
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Good choice IMO
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.