ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 February 2016, 09:20 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
5140 vs 5205
Yes, yes, an apples to oranges comparison, but I am curious which would you prefer to own as your "calendar" / "daily" watch?
- Perpetual vs. annual - 37.5 vs. a small 40 mm - Subdial display vs. apertures - 5140 is thinner (dressier / more elegant) vs. 5205 thicker (sportier) - traditional design vs. something a little more "fresh"? I would appreciate comments on the these two regardless of case material, etc. BUT, something has crossed my mind and that something is the following: 5205R that I currently own being replaced by 5140P. thanks. My imagine: IMG_3512.jpg Someone else's image: P01_zps4aef2b6f.jpg
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
25 February 2016, 09:32 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,187
|
I am a huge fan of the 5140p blue dial. Tough to find one in minty condition, but it is possible. If you know of one and decide not to move forward, I'd love to know where it is.
FWIW, I recently tried on the blue 5140p. It was extremely comfortable and easily could be a wonderful daily. The one I tried was definitely someone's daily, worn without too much care IMHO. The watch has great weight (platinum!) and presence for being on the "smaller" side by today's standards, and it felt so right. Good luck!
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
25 February 2016, 09:32 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,170
|
While I like the perpetual calendar function, I have trouble with the price differential from an annual. That, and the size difference would keep me in the 5205 out of those two.
Blue dial is pretty darn nice to look at though... |
25 February 2016, 09:34 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
|
25 February 2016, 09:34 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
I prefer date in a window. Both amazing pieces Thomas--can't go wrong!
|
25 February 2016, 09:40 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
yeah, thanks Bill. Best!
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
25 February 2016, 09:54 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,051
|
love the 5140 if it fits you.
__________________
|
25 February 2016, 10:30 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,289
|
I prefer the 5205, the 5140 is a little too small and cluttered.
|
25 February 2016, 10:40 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Rich
Location: United States
Posts: 299
|
I really like the 5205. Awesome looking piece.
|
25 February 2016, 11:18 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,258
|
5205 has my vote
|
25 February 2016, 11:32 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 8,977
|
I prefer the 5140
|
25 February 2016, 11:50 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Third Degree
Location: Glenfinnan
Watch: the step
Posts: 1,874
|
5140 gets my vote.
|
25 February 2016, 01:00 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,343
|
I would say that a platinum PC is definitely nicer than a RG AC. However considering the price is double for the platinum PC, consider your options carefully and make sure it is something you will definitely appreciate.
|
25 February 2016, 01:31 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
Thanks G! you mean it's small?
Cheers. Expected nothing less from a rose gold lover! Thanks bud Thanks much. You seem to prefer white metals from what ive "seen" of your stunning collection of pateks! Let's see what happens, just a thought for now. Best.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
25 February 2016, 01:53 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: East and West
Posts: 1,894
|
Actually prefer the 3940 to the 5140 but the blue version 5140 is nice. No second hand though. 5205 in RG black dial is a beauty. They wear completely differently though. Worth a good try on.
|
25 February 2016, 01:56 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,051
|
Yes it's just a bit on the small side (37?) when I tried it on.
It's beautiful as they come imho. The previous version is 36 and a bit more legible in the subdials but the blue dial version in amazing!
__________________
|
25 February 2016, 03:02 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
The blue is really devastating, saw it at an AD awhile back and it just sparkled.
__________________
Instagram: soundsoserious |
25 February 2016, 04:57 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Paradise
Watch: on the dark side
Posts: 543
|
Easy choice for me!
The 5140! Why? + perpetual calendar + amazing blue dial + due its thinness it is very comfortable and discreet Though I wish the 5140 has the more legible subdials (weekday, month) from the previous 3940... |
25 February 2016, 10:27 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
26 February 2016, 01:38 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 219
|
5140
5140 for sure.
|
26 February 2016, 02:05 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Had a similar dilemma
The 5140 looks great in pics but rather small in person. I'd hold off to see what they replace it with |
26 February 2016, 03:20 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 802
|
|
26 February 2016, 09:37 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
I have to go with your 5205 as I have always really liked it.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
27 February 2016, 07:44 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Oz
Watch: Rolex & Patek
Posts: 291
|
I would keep the 5205r - owning one myself it is gorgeous.
I am a BIG fan of blue dials and own two myself (Smurf & Daytona Blue Arab), but I think Patek has better options if you want to trade for a blue dial in this price range. |
27 February 2016, 12:53 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 432
|
I like both of them, but I also have a difficult time reading the time on both of these watches. I wish the 5140P had white hands, or the 5205R (black) had brushed hands.
|
27 February 2016, 03:48 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
|
5205r black face.
The perpetual is a very small sized watch for me |
27 February 2016, 04:17 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
|
Also prefer 5205. 5140 is too small.
|
27 February 2016, 05:14 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Randy
Location: malaysia
Posts: 298
|
5205G grey dial
__________________
AP Owners Club Instagram: @randyn2 |
27 February 2016, 05:51 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 1,888
|
5140 - but wait until Baselworld as there may be a new perpetual calander model being launched
|
28 February 2016, 11:59 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,051
|
Looking on Pateks website, I did not see the blue dialed 5140P offered.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.