ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Baptistman · 16 July 2008, 02:28 AM

Its great having the 16610 and 14060M side by side. they are both fab watches. The 16610 wears a little bigger and heavier, suppose this is down to the SEL and extra link arrangement within the clasp.

I would highly recommend either. From a feel point of view the 16610 does have the edge, watch feels more rigid, again I expect it's down to the bracelet. The 14060M is a more comfortable watch as it seems to sit a little flatter and forms better around the wrist bone.

frostie · 16 July 2008, 02:32 AM

Both are nice watches i remember i've tried both of them few months ago and if was to choose one between them it would be really hard

Both are winners IMHO

Trurolexer · 16 July 2008, 03:09 AM

Yup, whatever the model as long as Sub...

SUB RULES!!!

Tools · 16 July 2008, 03:35 AM

Even though they are both Subs, I still see each one as completely different from the other..

I suppose that a non-WIS might not see the difference, but they probably couldn't tell a black bezel GMT from a Sub either...

walds11 · 16 July 2008, 03:54 AM

Jon, you are making my decision even tougher. LOL. I tried on a 14060M non-COSC version last week at the local AD. I found that it was more comfy on the wrist due to not having SEL and the slightly thinner case. Decisions, decisions, but like you said, you can go wrong with either.

16 July 2008, 02:28 AM	#1
Baptistman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Jon Location: UK Posts: 2,405	16610 and 14060M Its great having the 16610 and 14060M side by side. they are both fab watches. The 16610 wears a little bigger and heavier, suppose this is down to the SEL and extra link arrangement within the clasp. I would highly recommend either. From a feel point of view the 16610 does have the edge, watch feels more rigid, again I expect it's down to the bracelet. The 14060M is a more comfortable watch as it seems to sit a little flatter and forms better around the wrist bone. __________________ Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it

16 July 2008, 02:32 AM	#2
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	Both are nice watches i remember i've tried both of them few months ago and if was to choose one between them it would be really hard Both are winners IMHO __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

16 July 2008, 03:35 AM	#4
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,139	Even though they are both Subs, I still see each one as completely different from the other.. I suppose that a non-WIS might not see the difference, but they probably couldn't tell a black bezel GMT from a Sub either... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

16 July 2008, 03:54 AM	#5
walds11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Adam Location: Philly ‘burbs Posts: 5,634	Jon, you are making my decision even tougher. LOL. I tried on a 14060M non-COSC version last week at the local AD. I found that it was more comfy on the wrist due to not having SEL and the slightly thinner case. Decisions, decisions, but like you said, you can go wrong with either. __________________ Adam

16 July 2008, 03:09 AM	#3
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Yup, whatever the model as long as Sub... SUB RULES!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)