The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 February 2024, 08:35 PM   #1
Moondoggy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Berty
Location: NI/Aust/USA
Watch: and wait
Posts: 3,134
I could be wrong

And I do not care is the 36mm making a comeback in popularity, I mean Panerai started the hype is everything going smaller like me?
__________________
Permanent social programs that finance and enable poor life choices usually keep the “intentions matter more than results” crowd in control.

Never argue with a fool, as eventually it will be difficult to tell the difference.
Moondoggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2024, 08:45 PM   #2
Little machines
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Joseph
Location: USA
Posts: 2,495
Purchase the watch that speaks to you !Berty there is truth to your statement !!
Little machines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2024, 09:39 PM   #3
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,384
I don’t know about a trend per se but I certainly have to say that I’ve gravitated toward smaller watches as I get a bit further along in my journey.

Watches in the 40 mm size range just seem to suit me best. They aren’t overly large and they aren’t too small.

They slide under a cuff easily and they’re just easier to wear (for me).

I’ve owned up to 47 mm, and really did love larger watches at one point. Now, I guess I just want to wear references that still have some wrist presence without all the bulk
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2024, 09:48 PM   #4
Rolexken
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: England
Posts: 792
Regarding the smaller trend I have a GShock GSteel and over the last 5 years they have come down with each issue from over 50mm and the new release is 42mm.
Rolexken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2024, 10:30 PM   #5
Ninja Master
"TRF" Member
 
Ninja Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 133
I have a 36" OP and a 42" Speedmaster. Both look good on my wrist.

I prefer smaller, but I like we have options and everyone should get what they like and what works on their wrist.
Ninja Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2024, 11:01 PM   #6
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 45,278
Plenty of opportunity to own watches in any size that appeals to you. I have watches from 39mm to 49mm and wear them all when I cycle through the collection.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2024, 11:27 PM   #7
travisb
2024 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,444
There will always be a wide range in sizes to choose from regardless of what's trending. 40-44mm seems to be my sweet spot.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 12:15 AM   #8
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,962
There’s no question smaller watches have been en vogue the last year or two. I attribute it to people’s obsession with the crash and other vintage Cartier.

Personally I find 38-40 to be my preference but I’ll wear any size if I love the watch. I’m actually more concerned with case thickness and weight than diameter.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 12:28 AM   #9
Calatrava r
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 10,708
I wear all sizes. To me there is no correct size. Whatever suits at the moment is the right size.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 01:06 AM   #10
DJH1977
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 402
I find there are a lot of variables other than size. I generally find watches over 40mm not comfortable for a day, I've discovered. But there are exceptions. Yachtmaster 42 springs to mind. Supremely comfortable on my wrist.
DJH1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 01:11 AM   #11
RTG
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
RTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: YM42 Ti
Posts: 2,521
I’m going to wear the 50mm Deepsea Challenge today, just to be contrary.
__________________
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
RTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 01:14 AM   #12
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTG View Post
I’m going to wear the 50mm Deepsea Challenge today, just to be contrary.
That’s showing us
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 01:19 AM   #13
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,947
Could 34mm be far behind?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 01:20 AM   #14
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,258
I could be wrong

I don’t see it trending one way or the other industry wide. Large watches aren’t going away, no doubt. But I think we’re also seeing a lot more options for smaller watches across the industry. So I see more options across the board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 02:16 AM   #15
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,833
Watch and dial design are far more important than the actual measurement. For example, the 41mm DJ looks too big to my eye because of the layout and width of the hands, while the 36mm DJ looks perfect. Same with the Explorer. Sometimes there’s too much real estate on the dial.

But the 41mm Sub looks perfect too, and a 36mm version would look silly. Again, don’t get hung up on numbers and instead see how it looks on the wrist.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 05:53 AM   #16
Jonny8
"TRF" Member
 
Jonny8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 125
38mm is probably the smallest I enjoy before I think it looks too small for me. My sweet spot is 40mm but agree it depends on the watch. Also there are other figures that come into play such as lug to lug and thickness.
Jonny8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 08:11 AM   #17
rockysw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 594
I have recently been thinking about smaller watches and have tried on couple of 37mm watches (not too expensive) with the idea that if I liked the size I would think about DJ 36 or exp 36. I liked them for a couple of days but then later I started to think they are too small for my wrist.
rockysw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 08:50 AM   #18
Order 72
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: international
Posts: 41
Panerai now has quaranta, 40mm, choices in luminor and radiomir, which are super nice.
Order 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 09:15 AM   #19
omar-rye
"TRF" Member
 
omar-rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,212
Too small > too large.
omar-rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 09:35 AM   #20
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,740
Hmmmmm... now call me crazy, yet i wear what i love. You know, enjoy your time and all that. Plus different situations kinda dictate a different timepiece.
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 09:53 AM   #21
Joearch
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,569
Trend toward smaller? Seems like Rolex has made their signature watches a bit more robust, yet refined with each update over the last 10 years.
Joearch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 09:59 AM   #22
DannyO
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Danny
Location: Charleston WV
Watch: 116622 14060
Posts: 106
I have a theory that the less cluttered the dial, the smaller the watch. Explorer 1, Tudor Ranger, Precision 5500, Rolex OP 36, 37 Yacht Master etc. I could kick myself for passing on a Rolex OP 34 Olive, what a sleeper of a watch.
DannyO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 10:11 AM   #23
colonelpurple
2024 Pledge Member
 
colonelpurple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 397
lug to lug and thinness are important. dial size is irrelevant to wear - it is just taste
colonelpurple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 10:24 AM   #24
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,841
It depends on the watch design. Panerai for example still has its 44mm as its most popular size. Rolex design lends its self to 36-40mm. What I am getting at its design is as important as its measurements.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 10:37 AM   #25
jb335
2024 Pledge Member
 
jb335's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,000
There has been a definite trend towards smaller watches over the last several years.

I work in fashion with all the trendy kids (I am neither) and they all wear 36 or even smaller. Ironically, their pants and shirts get more oversized though. Go figure.

The only people holding on to the oversized watch look seem to be ppl 45 and older and came of age in the watch game during the Panerai craze. Same people that say a Daytona is a women’s watch (eye roll). And/or people from Florida. Joking!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jb335 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 10:42 AM   #26
jb335
2024 Pledge Member
 
jb335's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Watch and dial design are far more important than the actual measurement. For example, the 41mm DJ looks too big to my eye because of the layout and width of the hands, while the 36mm DJ looks perfect. Same with the Explorer. Sometimes there’s too much real estate on the dial.

But the 41mm Sub looks perfect too, and a 36mm version would look silly. Again, don’t get hung up on numbers and instead see how it looks on the wrist.

I totally agree.

I have fully embraced watches under 40. Will only buy a DJ/DD/OP in 36, but I do feel the Sub41 works due to its excellent proportions. While the previous SubC 40 does not work due to its unique proportions.

And yes, can’t go on size measurement alone. Execution is paramount.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jb335 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 11:11 AM   #27
ndirish2001
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Watch and dial design are far more important than the actual measurement. For example, the 41mm DJ looks too big to my eye because of the layout and width of the hands, while the 36mm DJ looks perfect. Same with the Explorer. Sometimes there’s too much real estate on the dial.

But the 41mm Sub looks perfect too, and a 36mm version would look silly. Again, don’t get hung up on numbers and instead see how it looks on the wrist.

The 41mm DJ looks odd in part because the bezel is disproportionately large. It’s about 50% wider than the bezel on the 36mm DJ.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ndirish2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 12:02 PM   #28
KatGirl
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,801
Being a female, I find 36 mm a great size. It looks substantial, but not overpowering. So, it’s a perfect size, for me. For a man, I like 39 to 42, assuming the 42’s lugs do not overhang the sides of his wrist. Here, I’ve noticed some guys with skinny wrists wear watches, that I consider too big for them. It could just be the orientation of their pics, though. I think the Skydweller looks too big, on a lot of guys. As for the DayDate, I generally prefer the 36 mm on most people, male, or female. I feel like such an elegant piece should be a bit on the smaller side, though, of course it’s more prominent, on a female wrist. Being PM, the 36 works well, on a woman. These are just my personal observations.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 12:10 PM   #29
Easy E
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 4,447
I just recently picked up an Omega Ultra Deep…..so, there’s that.
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2024, 12:31 PM   #30
Mccall86
"TRF" Member
 
Mccall86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Posts: 879
I used to wear 40mm+ divers every day. My intro to Rolex was a DJ36. At first it seemed small but I loved the wearability and proportions of it. I wear long sleeves pretty much all winter and it slides under cuffs effortlessly. I've been wearing it almost every day since picking it up and have downsized my collection to just 3 watches now. I still have a 40mm Seiko spb143 dive watch and it seems almost too big to wear now. I have 7.25" wrists so I can definitely pull off larger watches but I don't see myself wearing anything over 40mm again. I am actually looking to pick up a 16570 Exp II because of its smaller size for a tool watch and then I'll have the perfect collection for me. I don't care about following trends but it does seem like smaller sizes are becoming more popular.
Mccall86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.